Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] having another Python gateway block problem

2011-12-19 Thread Paul Miller
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:54:02AM -0800, Josh Blum wrote: > Are you positive that its not a problem with the gui sink itself. See > this bug: http://gnuradio.org/redmine/issues/464 > One way around it would be to feed both float signals into a float to Yeah, that's the problem, thanks. The work

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Vector operation in GRC

2011-12-19 Thread Marcus D. Leech
And of course, you can always put a GRC wrapper around your custom block... Indeed, and donate it back to the community... -- Marcus Leech Principal Investigator Shirleys Bay Radio Astronomy Consortium http://www.sbrac.org ___ Discuss-gnuradio m

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Vector operation in GRC

2011-12-19 Thread Allen, Cam
And of course, you can always put a GRC wrapper around your custom block... -Original Message- From: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+callen=mitre@gnu.org [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+callen=mitre@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ed Criscuolo Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 5:18 PM To: discuss

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Vector operation in GRC

2011-12-19 Thread Marcus D. Leech
If you're somewhat familiar with how to write/modify blocks, it probably wouldn't be difficult to implement that functionality by making a new block that is a copy of gr_multiply_const_vcc.cc (for instance) and changing the work function to do what you want. Sean Here's a vector-subtract grap

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Vector operation in GRC

2011-12-19 Thread Ed Criscuolo
Yes, I can do my own blocks. It would be pretty trivial to do it there. I just wanted to know if there was an easy way to do it solely using GRC. @(^.^)@ Ed On 12/19/11 5:05 PM, Nowlan, Sean wrote: If you're somewhat familiar with how to write/modify blocks, it probably wouldn't be diffi

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Vector operation in GRC

2011-12-19 Thread Ed Criscuolo
I did a hand-contrived case with a simple 16-element vector, and it seems to work. @(^.^)@ Ed On 12/19/11 4:58 PM, Allen, Cam wrote: Hmm... I'm not sure about that. Seems reasonable to assume that the stream-to-vector and vector-to-stream blocks would be inverses of each other. Mostly I'd

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Vector operation in GRC

2011-12-19 Thread Nowlan, Sean
If you're somewhat familiar with how to write/modify blocks, it probably wouldn't be difficult to implement that functionality by making a new block that is a copy of gr_multiply_const_vcc.cc (for instance) and changing the work function to do what you want. Sean -Original Message- Fro

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Vector operation in GRC

2011-12-19 Thread Allen, Cam
Hmm... I'm not sure about that. Seems reasonable to assume that the stream-to-vector and vector-to-stream blocks would be inverses of each other. Mostly I'd just be worried about the first or last subtraction - you might only get a length 1023 vector out at the end. When you link it up, can y

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Vector operation in GRC

2011-12-19 Thread Ed Criscuolo
Will that preserve the absolute positions of the original vector elements? The initial vector represents an FFT, so it's important to me that I keep the same positions. @(^.^)@ Ed On 12/19/11 4:33 PM, Allen, Cam wrote: I would probably try converting the vector to a stream, delay the stream b

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Vector operation in GRC

2011-12-19 Thread Allen, Cam
I would probably try converting the vector to a stream, delay the stream by 1 sample, subtract one stream from the other, and then convert the resulting (difference) stream back to a vector. -Cam -Original Message- From: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+callen=mitre@gnu.org [mailto:discuss

[Discuss-gnuradio] Vector operation in GRC

2011-12-19 Thread Ed Criscuolo
I have a vector quantity (size 1024), and I want to do a calculation on it such that v_out[i] = v_in[i] - v_in[i-1] Is such a calculation possible in GRC? I haven't found any way to get a hold of the individual elements of a vector. @(^.^)@ Ed ___ D

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] [USRP-users] Modification on vita_tx_chain.v

2011-12-19 Thread Ian Buckley
Ok, I glanced at your code quickly, here are my thoughts (some of which you may already do in files I haven't seen): 1) You are using tx_io[15] as a potentially highspeed I/O. This signal travels via the radio daughter cards and could easily lead to EMI noise issues. You could consider multiple

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Software Radio Implementation Forum workshop

2011-12-19 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Matt Mills wrote: > Any chance it could be recorded or webcast for those of us a tad further > away? > I'm not sure. That's a question for the organizers. If there is a recording of it, I'll be sure to let everyone know. Tom > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:20 P

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New structural change

2011-12-19 Thread Michael Dickens
On Dec 19, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Philip Balister wrote: At the same time, can we clean up the various combination of -I/usr/inclide/gnuradio etc with #include "gr-header.h" #include "gnuradio/gr-header.h" ? I'd like to see the use of -I dropped where possible and all hea

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Software Radio Implementation Forum workshop

2011-12-19 Thread Matt Mills
Any chance it could be recorded or webcast for those of us a tad further away? On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > Hey everyone, > I just wanted to let everyone know that I will be speaking at the new > Software Radio Implementation Forum's (SRIF) first workshop this January. >

[Discuss-gnuradio] Software Radio Implementation Forum workshop

2011-12-19 Thread Tom Rondeau
Hey everyone, I just wanted to let everyone know that I will be speaking at the new Software Radio Implementation Forum's (SRIF) first workshop this January. It's in Hong Kong, but registration is free for people in that part of the world. You can find more details about it here: http://srif2012.i

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Wxgui strange problem

2011-12-19 Thread Marcus D. Leech
Andrew - It would probably be helpful if we could confirm that someone else with the same setup sees the same issue. What versions of of the WX libraries and development packages do you have installed? What checkout of GNU Radio do you have? What about the relevant Python packages? Cheer

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New structural change

2011-12-19 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Michael Dickens wrote: > On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > > The differences, though, coming in the naming scheme and installation > > method. Instead of having a gr_.h file installed into > > $prefix/include/gnuradio, it's just .h that is installe

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New structural change

2011-12-19 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Philip Balister wrote: > On 12/18/2011 08:30 PM, Michael Dickens wrote: > > On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > >> The differences, though, coming in the naming scheme and installation > >> method. Instead of having a gr_.h file installed into > >> $

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New structural change

2011-12-19 Thread Tom Rondeau
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Martin Braun wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 03:41:13PM -0500, Tom Rondeau wrote: > > Hey list, > > > > I'm working on merging Josh's gr_blocks branch into GNU Radio, and he's > made a > > few structural changes to how things will be installed. I wanted to have >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New structural change

2011-12-19 Thread Josh Blum
> could you please give us a link to the relevant branch? Josh sends so > many git-URLs around, it's a bit hard to keep track :) > Browse here: http://gnuradio.org/cgit/jblum.git/tree/gr-blocks?h=gr_blocks http://gnuradio.org/cgit/jblum.git/tree/gr-filter?h=gr_blocks -Josh __

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] having another Python gateway block problem

2011-12-19 Thread Josh Blum
On 12/19/2011 07:58 AM, Paul Miller wrote: > If I'm doing something dumb, I can't find it. Happens all the > time though. I'm using the python_blocks branch > 5cd66eef8ab8a81589dc08a134457d15b431434e . > > I made a really simple sync_block that square-waves an input > signal. I have a fancy b

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New structural change

2011-12-19 Thread Ben Hilburn
I also like the structure change, and I think Michael's suggestion for handling the migration is perfect. Cheers, Ben On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Michael Dickens wrote: > On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: > > The differences, though, coming in the naming scheme and installat

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Wxgui strange problem

2011-12-19 Thread Ben Hilburn
Andrew - It would probably be helpful if we could confirm that someone else with the same setup sees the same issue. What versions of of the WX libraries and development packages do you have installed? What checkout of GNU Radio do you have? What about the relevant Python packages? Cheers, Ben

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New structural change

2011-12-19 Thread Philip Balister
On 12/18/2011 08:30 PM, Michael Dickens wrote: > On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Tom Rondeau wrote: >> The differences, though, coming in the naming scheme and installation >> method. Instead of having a gr_.h file installed into >> $prefix/include/gnuradio, it's just .h that is installed into >> $pre

[Discuss-gnuradio] Added functionality for pre and post samples to burst tagger

2011-12-19 Thread Daniel Bartel
Hi, I have made some modifications to the existing burst tagger in the GNU Radio source code. It is now able to specify an amount of pre and post samples, which are additionally tagged before and after the tag signal. I have put my changes on my GitHub account, which is: https://bar...@github

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] New structural change

2011-12-19 Thread Martin Braun
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 03:41:13PM -0500, Tom Rondeau wrote: > Hey list, > > I'm working on merging Josh's gr_blocks branch into GNU Radio, and he's made a > few structural changes to how things will be installed. I wanted to have a > discussion to see what people felt about the changes. Note that