On 02/28/2011 08:21 AM, Feng Andrew Ge wrote:
> Josh,
>
> Thanks for sharing the information and your changes sound quite reasonable.
>
> However, it seems that your changes have introduced some bugs at the
> transmitter side. I updated my system using your new code (following
> your instructio
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Julián David Vásquez Gutiérrez
wrote:
> Hello: I need to use a external clock for the openBTS project and I found an
> inconsistency. I don't know if the changes are for the UDH driver.
>
> In gnuradio:
> http://gnuradio.org/redmine/wiki/gnuradio/OpenBTSClockModif
Hello: I need to use a external clock for the openBTS project and I found an
inconsistency. I don't know if the changes are for the UDH driver.
In gnuradio:
http://gnuradio.org/redmine/wiki/gnuradio/OpenBTSClockModifications
In ettus:
http://www.ettus.com/uhd_docs/manual/html/usrp1.html#linux-setup
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 02:24:29PM +0100, Alberto Trentadue wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am trying to define a customised block and I would like to understand
> better how the history works.
>
> I have opened the source of gr_moving_average_XX and I saw the following
> statement in the constructor:
>
schrieb Tom Rondeau am 2011-02-26 17:57:
> We are currently thinking 6 PM
> for central Europe, but we would like to hear back from those of you who
> are interested in joining this call to let us know your time
> availability/preferences.
This would be very fine for me in CET, not too early to ge
On 02/28/2011 10:02 AM, Thomas Tsou wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Josh Blum wrote:
>> ---
>> -- re-clocking support
>> ---
>> Re-clocking support ha
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Josh Blum wrote:
> ---
> -- re-clocking support
> ---
> Re-clocking support has been added to the API:
> http://www.ettus.com/uhd
Further, I found that at the packet size of 1500B, the interval between
two packet transmissions must be less than about 20ms (on an intel
i5-M20 processor); otherwise, the received side couldn't not receive any
packets. This interval decreases as the packet size decreases.
Andrew
On 02/28/20
On 02/27/2011 11:48 PM, Khalid Jamil wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have eight (08) USRP N210s that has been synchronized using 10MHZ and
> 1PPS reference. I am receiving data from them using a gigabit ethernet
> switch to my computer.
>
> My question is when I will receive packets from all of them throu
Josh,
Thanks for sharing the information and your changes sound quite reasonable.
However, it seems that your changes have introduced some bugs at the
transmitter side. I updated my system using your new code (following
your instructions in your Feb. 24's email titled "Re: GRC + N210 +
RFX220
Dear all,
I'm wondering is there any approach can reconfigure the parameters for
top_block while it is running. I've seen a video on Youtube that implemented
the tuning frequency hopping, which is named "A program written for the GNU
Radio that changes the TX frequency of the USRP". This video
Dear all,I'm wondering is there any approach can reconfigure the parameters for top_block while it is running. I've seen a video on Youtube that implemented the tuning frequency hopping, which is named "A program written for the GNU Radio that changes the TX frequency of the USRP". This video shows
I have to do almost the same thing. But me, I have to bypass the data from the
ADC by the mictor connector to a board from Xilinx, a ML401. All the filter
for equalizers or other types should be done in this one and the data go back
in the usrp2 by the mictor connector again.
Gabriel
-
Hello,
Sorry for answering so late.
@Gabriel Morel
For my Master Thesis I had to implement a kind of test bench for different
versions of a particular block. Nothing really complex, multiplexers,
filters, etc. The point is I must use the USRP2 board.
@Matthias Wilhelm
Could I ask why you recom
OK. I'll only test stuff down to 2.5 then.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Tom Rondeau wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Josh Blum wrote:
>>
>> FYI, grc only works with 2.5 and up. Ive only tested up to 2.7
>>
>> -Josh
>
> Yes, Josh is right, I just looked to refresh my memory. GRC make
Hello,
Until last week I was using the Gnu Radio 3.2.2 (which is ready for use in
ubuntu), then I decided to try the latest version (v3.3.1git-147-g5a23954a).
The flowgraph was working perfectly. It's for "in" GRC simulation only. I
know it's very simple and the 38kHz recovery (at the receiver) is
Hello
I am trying to define a customised block and I would like to understand better
how the history works.
I have opened the source of gr_moving_average_XX and I saw the following
statement in the constructor:
@NAME@::@NAME@ (int length, @O_TYPE@ scale, int max_iter)
: gr_sync_block ("@BASE
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Josh Blum wrote:
> FYI, grc only works with 2.5 and up. Ive only tested up to 2.7
>
> -Josh
Yes, Josh is right, I just looked to refresh my memory. GRC makes a check
for Python >= 2.5. The rest of GNU Radio doesn't check for a specific
version, just that certai
Hi
I wonder if anyone used Gnu Radio on an Android based netbook? I have a Toshiba
AC100 and wonder if it can run GR?
http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/21/toshibas-ac100-8-hour-smartbook-runs-android-2-1-on-a-1ghz-tegr/
I know it is not fast enough, 1Ghz processor is not enough for any advanced
p
FYI, grc only works with 2.5 and up. Ive only tested up to 2.7
-Josh
On 02/27/2011 09:43 PM, Ben Reynwar wrote:
> I just tested the next branch with 2.4 and the only incompatibility
> was a "with" statement in gr_xmlrunner.py.
> The "with" statement was introduced in 2.5.
>
> Once that was remo
On 02/27/2011 10:21 PM, Howard Wong wrote:
> Thanks for your kindly reply.
>
> Can you explain more that, both sides from the center frequency of the
> input frequency has been cut by a low pass filter.
>
If you want to filter around 0 to f, then use the complex bandpass
filter. Its the same F
On 02/27/2011 11:48 PM, Khalid Jamil wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have eight (08) USRP N210s that has been synchronized using 10MHZ and 1PPS
> reference. I am receiving data from them using a gigabit ethernet switch to
> my computer.
>
> My question is when I will receive packets from all of them thro
22 matches
Mail list logo