subodh chiwate wrote:
Hi to all,
I need to implement a RFID reader using GNURadio RFX900.
I wanted to know urgently that is it possible to use a single
RFX900 for simultaneously transmitting and receiving.
Yes. You need to be transmitting and receiving on frequencies which
are separated by
Hi to all,
I need to implement a RFID reader using GNURadio RFX900.
I wanted to know urgently that is it possible to use a single
RFX900 for simultaneously transmitting and receiving.
I am in a hurry to purchase the stuff so I can receive it before holidays.
Prompt responses are highly appreciat
Thanks, Eric.
One thing to remember when talking about both GNU Radio and FlexRadio
> is that they are each a combination of separable software and hardware.
>
Yeah, that's be a helpful distinction.
Matt's USRP offerings (USRP1, USRP2) don't provide a high-performance
> out of the box (narrow ba
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 06:20:37PM -0500, George Nychis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Has anyone had any luck with USRP2 on Mac OS X? I was wondering if anyone
> was working on this, has made any progress, or if there was any general game
> plan.
>
> - George
It'll be fixed as part of the work on VRT.
Hi all,
Has anyone had any luck with USRP2 on Mac OS X? I was wondering if anyone
was working on this, has made any progress, or if there was any general game
plan.
- George
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.or
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:08, John Gilmore wrote:
>> Now that there is a functional basestation available for GSM, I was
>> wondering if anyone is trying to build software for a GSM handset. This
>> way, I could use my laptop (e.g. in a manner similar to skype) to talk with
>> folks when I
Doug,
Thanks I'll try this. Googling a bit more I think fwrite has to be thread
safe, I'll double check my setup again and have another think if this
doesn't help.
Cheers,
Tim
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Doug Geiger wrote:
> Tim Pearce wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> After experimenting a bit
Achilleas Anastasopoulos wrote:
> Where is the functional base station for GSM available?
http://openbts.sourceforge.net/
Sylvain
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
Tim Pearce wrote:
Hi Guys,
After experimenting a bit more I think the issue was my test setup.
Previously I was using python to setup a USRP Source (with timestamps)
and save both the samples (64 bit) and timestamps (32bit) to a file
sink to process by importing with numpy and checking timest
Oops sorry guys this is in reply to the wrong timestamp question -- I had
meant to reply to this thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2009-11/msg00069.html
Cheers,
Tim
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Tim Pearce wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> After experimenting a bit more I think
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:33:56AM +1300, Ben Hoyt wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm going to be doing some research on digital comms on HF bands, and I'm
> having trouble deciding between the GNU Radio and the FlexRadio as a
> platform. The GNU Radio seems more general-purpose, and the FlexRadio more
> h
Hi Guys,
After experimenting a bit more I think the issue was my test setup.
Previously I was using python to setup a USRP Source (with timestamps) and
save both the samples (64 bit) and timestamps (32bit) to a file sink to
process by importing with numpy and checking timestamps later.
At 25MHz
Where is the functional base station for GSM available?
thanks
Achilleas
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Stefan Brüns
wrote:
> 2) ethtool eth0
exactly - that's the last thing I checked, and it reported that only
10/100 Mbps was supported with my card (I thought that was especially
weird for a gbe card). Then I checked the kernel source and found the
atl1e
On Thursday 19 November 2009 15:36:38 Christopher Friedt wrote:
> I see what the issue is:
>
> Some ATL cards incorrectly appear as "L1 Gigabit Ethernet" cards in
> lspci, but they are actually the L2 adapters, which only support
> 10/100 Mbps networking.
>
> That would explain a lot!
List of tool
Christoph Thein wrote:
I have a need to connect three USRP2's together, and am curious as to
the status of the proposed MIMO hub.
If the MIMO hub is not available, are there any recommendations for a
reference clock to use to synchronize these systems.
- Wayde
___
I see what the issue is:
Some ATL cards incorrectly appear as "L1 Gigabit Ethernet" cards in
lspci, but they are actually the L2 adapters, which only support
10/100 Mbps networking.
That would explain a lot!
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Christopher Friedt
wrote:
> Someone told me that the U
17 matches
Mail list logo