WX is only used with the wxgui stuff. GRC can would function fine
without WX, or the wxgui blocks. And flow graphs can be run in a non
graphical mode.
Basically, the test imports are all things that the Editor uses. gtk,
pyxml... and wx for running the flow graphs. I decided on the "import
te
Does GRC using WX for anything until running a flow-graph? I assume
it's included because of the scopes and such in gr-wxgui? I tried
running some of the examples, and they bring up the WX GUI scopes
just fine.
If I remove 'wx' from the modules check list in Editor.py, then GRC
brings u
grc-0.69 does NOT work using "./Editor.py" ... I had bypassed the
checking incorrectly. My bad.
Here is something that might help. In the latest trunk, if I do:
---
cd src
python
>>> from ActionHandler import ActionHandler
>>> ActionHandler ("")
---
Then everything works OK. If I try
Michael Dickens wrote:
I downloaded grc-0.65 (stable) and grc-0.69 (stable). The former (using
Run.py) brings up a window and looks to be working; there are no "bus
error"s. The latter (using Editor.py, and after removing the "gtk"
check) works as well. Both of these were tested using the ex
On Oct 3, 2007, at 4:11 PM, Eric Blossom wrote:
In the random stab in the dark department: I wonder if the problem is
in pyexpat.c, and whether it was compiled with -O1 optimization on the
PPC. (Somebody really ought to create a small test case for the gcc
guys and log a bug.)
Indeed that woul
I downloaded grc-0.65 (stable) and grc-0.69 (stable). The former
(using Run.py) brings up a window and looks to be working; there are
no "bus error"s. The latter (using Editor.py, and after removing the
"gtk" check) works as well. Both of these were tested using the
exact same Python ins
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 03:34:58PM -0400, Michael Dickens wrote:
> Maybe it's the use of python 2.5?
>
> Has anyone (on this list, or if you know someone) ever used GRC on
> OSX? As I said, I've never tried to until this morning.
>
> >1) I suppose numbersink2 is not in your particular gnuradio
On 10/3/07, Michael Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe it's the use of python 2.5?
>
I think all of the ubuntu and fedora people have python 2.5.
> Has anyone (on this list, or if you know someone) ever used GRC on
> OSX? As I said, I've never tried to until this morning.
I have run GRC
On 10/3/07, Michael Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe it's the use of python 2.5?
>
> Has anyone (on this list, or if you know someone) ever used GRC on
> OSX? As I said, I've never tried to until this morning.
This really isn't my forte, but a quick search and I saw this page:
htt
Just reconfigured and tested, looks like benchmark_loopback is working
fine now on all my systems. Thanks everyone!
Dev
Eric Blossom wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:42:43PM -0700, Tim Meehan wrote:
The update seems to work. I re-ran configure and verified that the SSE code
was being used.
Maybe it's the use of python 2.5?
Has anyone (on this list, or if you know someone) ever used GRC on
OSX? As I said, I've never tried to until this morning.
1) I suppose numbersink2 is not in your particular gnuradio build.
Checkout the trunk again.
Done. Nothing changed.
2) There is n
1) I suppose numbersink2 is not in your particular gnuradio build.
Checkout the trunk again.
2) There is no config file when you first load GRC. When you close
GRC, it will create the config file, and the error will be gone
thereafter.
3) Bus Error? I have no idea... There are no "un-intialized"
--- Michael Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to run ./Editor.py on the latest GRC SVN trunk on OSX
> 10.4.10 (checked out as of this morning). I've used MacPorts to
> install python 2.5, python wx, python gtk2, and python xml (along
> with their dependencies, and all of the
I'm trying to run ./Editor.py on the latest GRC SVN trunk on OSX
10.4.10 (checked out as of this morning). I've used MacPorts to
install python 2.5, python wx, python gtk2, and python xml (along
with their dependencies, and all of the GNU Radio dependencies).
When I run ./Editor.py, I get
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 04:15:41AM -0700, Matt Ettus wrote:
> Andrey A wrote:
> > Hi!
> > We are considering the possibility of bying a couple of USRP boards
> > for building the MIMO 2 RX 2 TX duplex system.
> >
> > 1. For us it is critical to know the precise size on FIFO buffers. So
> > we could
Andrey A wrote:
> Hi!
> We are considering the possibility of bying a couple of USRP boards
> for building the MIMO 2 RX 2 TX duplex system.
>
> 1. For us it is critical to know the precise size on FIFO buffers. So
> we could evaluate overrun / underrun probabilities.
>
> Matt said it is 2K lines.
Hi!
We are considering the possibility of bying a couple of USRP boards
for building the MIMO 2 RX 2 TX duplex system.
1. For us it is critical to know the precise size on FIFO buffers. So
we could evaluate overrun / underrun probabilities.
Matt said it is 2K lines. Does it mean 2048 bits?
2. Do
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > Of Brian Padalino
> > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 5:53 PM
> > To: Matt Ettus
> > Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Default FPGA I/O standard
> >
> > On 10/1/07,
18 matches
Mail list logo
