Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] benchmark_* not working correctly

2007-10-02 Thread Eric Blossom
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:42:43PM -0700, Tim Meehan wrote: > The update seems to work. I re-ran configure and verified that the SSE code > was being used. make check passes and the original code Dev had a problem > with "benchmark_loopback.py" works correctly. > > Tim Thanks! Eric _

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Default FPGA I/O standard

2007-10-02 Thread Nirali Patel
Thanks everyone for the help and information. I also discovered that if you want to increase the drive strength for any IO standard for the FPGA IO pins it is possible through the Assignment Editor in Quartus II under Logic Options by setting current_strength_new to Thanks again for all the infor

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] benchmark_* not working correctly

2007-10-02 Thread Tim Meehan
The update seems to work. I re-ran configure and verified that the SSE code was being used. make check passes and the original code Dev had a problem with "benchmark_loopback.py" works correctly. Tim On 10/2/07, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tim, > > I've checked a trial fix into

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] Default FPGA I/O standard

2007-10-02 Thread Bahn William L Civ USAFA/DFCS
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Brian Padalino > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 5:53 PM > To: Matt Ettus > Cc: discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org > Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Default FPGA I/O standard > > On 10/1/07, Matt Ettus <[EMAIL P

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Vista, Xp, or Linux?

2007-10-02 Thread Robert McGwier
On the ubuntu live cd (the installation CD) use gparted. It is already there and ready for that purpose without having to resort to "your favorite bittorrent copy" of partition magic. Bob Eng. Firas wrote: Hi, I suggest you run partition magic and divide your hard disk into a new partitio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] benchmark_* not working correctly

2007-10-02 Thread Eric Blossom
Tim, I've checked a trial fix into the trunk as of r6575. Can you please update and let me know if it fixes your problem? Thanks, Eric ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] benchmark_* not working correctly

2007-10-02 Thread Eric Blossom
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:52:06AM -0700, Tim Meehan wrote: > > > In the production code, I.e., where you are seeing problems (was it > > around gri_mmse_fir_interpolator?), do you see the alignment > > problem occur? > > > In the production code the "input" is declared in gr_mpsk_receiver_cc.h

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] benchmark_* not working correctly

2007-10-02 Thread Tim Meehan
On 10/2/07, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Yes I do see the 0RCR or R case. For example when I change the QA > code > > to use stack allocation for the input (uncommenting a piece of code > that > > was originally there, lines 110 and 111 in the QA code from trunk) the >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] benchmark_* not working correctly

2007-10-02 Thread Eric Blossom
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 04:10:07AM -0700, Tim Meehan wrote: > Eric, > > See reply embedded Thanks. > On 10/1/07, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 06:07:51PM -0700, Tim Meehan wrote: > > > Eric, > > > > > > > > > The QA code (qa_gr_fir_ccf.cc) forces a 16 by

RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] No horizontal sync with ntsc tv reception

2007-10-02 Thread Walker, Robert CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, Code 80EW
I believe Daniel Garcia implemented this a while ago. Check http://www.danielgarcia.info/thesis/ for info. I tested it and it seemed to work, but only when my TVRX was connected to cable TV. When hooked to an antenna, apparently the signal was not strong enough for the sync to function. Rob >O

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] benchmark_* not working correctly

2007-10-02 Thread Tim Meehan
Eric, See reply embedded On 10/1/07, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 06:07:51PM -0700, Tim Meehan wrote: > > Eric, > > > > > > The QA code (qa_gr_fir_ccf.cc) forces a 16 byte alignment. When the > > malloc16Allign is replaced with a regular malloc in the QA co