Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] usrp_sink_s and other quick questions

2007-05-21 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 04:19:58PM -0400, Steven Clark wrote: > If I need pin-level access to the DAC chip, sink_s is my only option AFAIK. > I understand that it's interleaved I&Q, don't worry about that. > My original questions remain. > > On 5/21/07, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] number of blocks in a burst over USB

2007-05-21 Thread Eric Blossom
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 12:11:35AM -0400, George Nychis wrote: > I've tried finding this number throughout code and documentation, but can't > seem to hunt it down. When using usrp_standard_rx::make(), the last > parameter is the number of blocks in a burst. What's the magic number? > > - Geo

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] End-to-end delay question

2007-05-21 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:21:48PM -0400, Michael Dickens wrote: > On May 21, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Eric Blossom wrote: > >We have the capability to request real time scheduling (currently only > >on systems that implment POSIX sched_setscheduler), but generally > >avoid it by default, since folks have

[Discuss-gnuradio] number of blocks in a burst over USB

2007-05-21 Thread George Nychis
I've tried finding this number throughout code and documentation, but can't seem to hunt it down. When using usrp_standard_rx::make(), the last parameter is the number of blocks in a burst. What's the magic number? - George ___ Discuss-gnuradio m

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] End-to-end delay question

2007-05-21 Thread Michael Dickens
On May 21, 2007, at 3:04 PM, Eric Blossom wrote: We have the capability to request real time scheduling (currently only on systems that implment POSIX sched_setscheduler), but generally avoid it by default, since folks have been known to frequently blow their own feet off. Looking at gnuradio-c

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] usrp_sink_s and other quick questions

2007-05-21 Thread Steven Clark
If I need pin-level access to the DAC chip, sink_s is my only option AFAIK. I understand that it's interleaved I&Q, don't worry about that. My original questions remain. On 5/21/07, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:48:04AM -0400, Steven Clark wrote: > Hi all- >

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] FreeBSD patches for gnuradio

2007-05-21 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 03:01:57PM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote: > http://www.db.net/~db/gnuradio-freebsd.tgz > > - Diane VA3DB > -- > - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.db.net/~db > Thanks! I'll take a look at them later today or tomorrow. Eric

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] End-to-end delay question

2007-05-21 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:13:37PM -0500, Steve Bunch wrote: > >Steve Bunch wrote: > >>I was listening to an FM station using > >>usrp_wfm_rcv.py -f 93.1 -O pcm32k > >> > >>After this had been going on for a couple of hours, the output on the > >>screen showed a large number of over/underruns (com

[Discuss-gnuradio] FreeBSD patches for gnuradio

2007-05-21 Thread Diane Bruce
http://www.db.net/~db/gnuradio-freebsd.tgz - Diane VA3DB -- - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.db.net/~db ___ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] usrp_sink_s and other quick questions

2007-05-21 Thread Eric Blossom
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:48:04AM -0400, Steven Clark wrote: > Hi all- > > Several quick questions. > 1) For usrp sink_s, which bit of the short activates the MSB of the DAC > chip? I.e., if I send 0bABCDEFGH IJKLMNOP, where each letter is either a 1 > or a 0, which letter matches the MSB? First

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Problems with a new module

2007-05-21 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 06:39:02PM +0200, Davide Anastasia wrote: > Hi List, > I have some problem to compile and test a new module I write starting > from gnuradio code. > This is what I do: > 1. take the "how to write blah blah" code and directory structure; > 2. modify code and src/lib/Makefile.

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] starting out

2007-05-21 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:19:40AM -0400, Mark Rader wrote: > Hi > > I have been looking at GNUradio for a while, and decided to start playing > with it. I purchased one of the USRPs with the TV receiver daugherter board > and the 800 MHz - 2.4 GHZ receiver board. I am trying to get some of the

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] r/s encoding and padding on gmsk

2007-05-21 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 01:48:33PM -0400, Brian Padalino wrote: > > > >In any case, in reading the associated python code, I noticed that the > >data sent over the USB seems to have to be in multiples of 128, but it > >also seemed to imply that it had to be multiples of 512. The current > >padding

[Discuss-gnuradio] usrp_sink_s and other quick questions

2007-05-21 Thread Steven Clark
Hi all- Several quick questions. 1) For usrp sink_s, which bit of the short activates the MSB of the DAC chip? I.e., if I send 0bABCDEFGH IJKLMNOP, where each letter is either a 1 or a 0, which letter matches the MSB? 2) If I want to generate a stream of alternating zeros and ones (stored in byt

[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Transfer function Basic TX

2007-05-21 Thread Patrick Strasser
Hello Giuseppe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2007-05-21 12:57: > Hi, i'm an Italian student. Not far from Austria! > I'm using an Oscilloscope with Basic Tx and finding a strange behaviour > sending > a costant value of 2. I see a sinusoidal wave generated from Nco (fine > modulator) + coars

[Discuss-gnuradio] Transfer function

2007-05-21 Thread pilla
Hi, i'm an Italian student. I'm using an Oscilloscope with Basic Tx and finding a strange behaviour sending a costant value of 2. I see a sinusoidal wave generated from Nco (fine modulator) + coarse modulator in this way : 32 MHz -> only coarse -> 670 mVpp 16 MHz -> only coarse -> 730 mVpp .

[Discuss-gnuradio] Transfer function

2007-05-21 Thread pilla
Hi, i'm an Italian student. I'm using an Oscilloscope with Basic Tx and finding a strange behaviour sending a costant value of 2. I see a sinusoidal wave generated from Nco (fine modulator) + coarse modulator in this way : 32 MHz -> only coarse -> 670 mVpp 16 MHz -> only coarse -> 730 mVpp .