On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 05:55:54PM -0500, M. Ranganathan wrote:
> I am hoping somebody can recommend a scanner with a 10.7 MHZ IF output
> to connect to the Ettus Research USRP + Basic RX that I just recently
> acquired. I googled around and found a couple but I lack experience to
> which ones are
AOR makes a good set of radios with IF outputs.
http://www.aorusa.com/b&m.html
High IP3, wide frequency range, and 10MHz BW IF. You can also disable the
AGC from the front panel.
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, M. Ranganathan wrote:
> I am hoping somebody can recommend a scanner with a 10.7 MHZ IF outp
I am not trying to be controversial (this is, after all the GNU Radio
list), but has anybody here worked with LinRadio/WinRadio ? I'm
wondering how GNU radio compares with LinRadio.
Ranga
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http
I am hoping somebody can recommend a scanner with a 10.7 MHZ IF output
to connect to the Ettus Research USRP + Basic RX that I just recently
acquired. I googled around and found a couple but I lack experience to
which ones are good. Any suggestions? I am just getting started with
this and I could u
John Clark wrote:
> John Ackermann N8UR schrieb:
>> I'm not aware that the 8640B has any GPIB capabilities; it's a manually
>> tuned instrument and doesn't have a CPU.
>
> That'll learn me to physically look at the equipment... but thanks for
> the reference for GPIB stuff.
It is a great HF sig
John Ackermann N8UR schrieb:
I'm not aware that the 8640B has any GPIB capabilities; it's a manually
tuned instrument and doesn't have a CPU.
That'll learn me to physically look at the equipment... but thanks for
the reference for GPIB stuff.
John Clark.
__
I just built a new system with SuSE 10.2.
On 12/12/06, Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:38:00AM -0800, Newell Jensen wrote:
> Eric,
>
> This is what the shell outputs:
You're on SuSE right? Which version?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gnuradio/gnuradio-core> rpm -q
John Clark wrote:
> Ok, I have my USRP setup understood, now I want to setup a calibration
> procedure, using
> an HP 8640B Signal Generator. The last time I had an interest in GPIB
> was in the early
> 80's and programming the TI 9914... (whatever happened to the TI 9900
> CPU... but I digress..
Ok, I have my USRP setup understood, now I want to setup a calibration
procedure, using
an HP 8640B Signal Generator. The last time I had an interest in GPIB
was in the early
80's and programming the TI 9914... (whatever happened to the TI 9900
CPU... but I digress...).
Anyway, I basically wan
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:38:00AM -0800, Newell Jensen wrote:
> Eric,
>
> This is what the shell outputs:
You're on SuSE right? Which version?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gnuradio/gnuradio-core> rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libstdc++.la
> error: file /usr/lib64/libstdc++.la: No such file or directory
> [EMAI
Hi Eric,
The OS I am using is Linux 2.6.17-1.2174_FC5
The hardware I am using is Memory of 512MB, Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU
2.53GHz.
As u predicted, I do observe a number of underruns on stderr when the
interpolation rate is set to low values. This might explain the results
for the case when interp
Eric,
This is what the shell outputs:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gnuradio/gnuradio-core> rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libstdc++.la
error: file /usr/lib64/libstdc++.la: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gnuradio/gnuradio-core> rpm -V libstdc++-devel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gnuradio/gnuradio-core> rpm -V l
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 09:35:00AM -0800, John Clark wrote:
> Eric Blossom schrieb:
> >
> >Are you seeing underruns ("uU") on stderr? If so, then for your low
> >interpolation rate cases your system is failing to be able to drive
> >the USRP at full speed (32MB/s). What kind of h/w are you runnin
Eric Blossom schrieb:
Are you seeing underruns ("uU") on stderr? If so, then for your low
interpolation rate cases your system is failing to be able to drive
the USRP at full speed (32MB/s). What kind of h/w are you running?
Speaking of which, what does 'uO' mean?
Thanks
John Clark.
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:03:08AM -0500, Shyam wrote:
> hi Eric,
> The daughterboard I use is RFX2400 so I set -f 2.45G ( btw my gnuradios
> have been properly set up since benchmark_tx and receive work fine for
> gmsk) . I have tried the below stated experiment using two antenna
> types to see
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 01:23:07AM -0800, Newell Jensen wrote:
> I thought I would shot this out over the list to see if anyone has dealt
> with this. I was able to build gnuradio and when I went to run make in
> gnuradio-core I ran into this:
>
> libtool: link: warning:
> `/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 04:42:50PM +0800, hanwen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm intersting with the buffer mechanism of GNU Radio. Is there any document
> about it? Or can someone explain it to me.
>
> Many THANKS!
Hi Hanwen,
I'm not exactly sure what level of detail you're looking for, but here
goes...
Eric A. Cottrell wrote:
> Is there a loopback audio device, maybe using Jack?
This is exactly the sort of thing jack was designed to do. You can
think of jack as providing virtual patchcords among the inputs
and/or outputs of all the audio applications you have running.
What you have to be awa
I thought I would shot this out over the list to see if anyone has dealt
with this. I was able to build gnuradio and when I went to run make in
gnuradio-core I ran into this:
libtool: link: warning:
`/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64//libfftw3f.la'
seems to be moved
grep:
Hi,
I'm intersting with the buffer mechanism of GNU Radio. Is there any document
about it? Or can someone explain it to me.
Many THANKS!
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
20 matches
Mail list logo
