On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 05:38:39PM -0500, Michael Ford wrote:
> Eric
>
> so I've been running this in python interactive mode, just to test. after
> searching around, I found this following post from you:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org/msg02044.html
>
> I know it was wr
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 03:09:40PM -0500, Michael Ford wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't mean 'channel.' I meant the subdevice.
>
> On 7/30/06, Michael Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Eric,
> >
> >You're right, I should have referred to the 'carrier freqency' as the
> >'center frequency.' That's wha
Ericso I've been running this in python interactive mode, just to test. after searching around, I found this following post from you:
http://www.mail-archive.com/discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org/msg02044.htmlI know it was written last September, but I figured I'd give things a shot.I'm doing the following
Sorry, I didn't mean 'channel.' I meant the subdevice.On 7/30/06, Michael Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric,You're right, I should have referred to the 'carrier freqency' as the 'center frequency.' That's what I meant; I apoligize for not being clear.
On the second note, I don't understand the s
Thanks a lot for writing that install guide for Mac OS X. It works
great.
Thanks! Good to hear it's being used successfully by folks outside
of UND.
Here some updates on my experience with it on a Macbook 2GHz
with XCode 2.3:
- The USRP section is outdated. You don't need to download it
s
I can tell you from the print-out that the issue is part of LIBUSB
("usb_claim_interface") which is used by the USRP, and not the USRP's
FUSB code for Darwin. Maybe there are patches for 0.1.12 for Intel
which are needed? Any other Intel-mac users see this?
As a side-related note (I use a
Eric,You're right, I should have referred to the 'carrier freqency' as the 'center frequency.' That's what I meant; I apoligize for not being clear.On the second note, I don't understand the second step of the 2-part process. Also, I don't understand what I should be setting the channel to. I have
Playing catch up ... some quick observations:
* You say a G5 iMac on (I assume 10.)4.4, but the script says that
it's using SSE. These are contradictory. Could it possibly be an
Intel iMac? This probably won't make a difference, but you never know.
* You're using a Flex 400 board, and tr
I forgot to mention that I have the RFX400 and RFX2400 daughterboards.
I also tried the same thing with both daughterboards removed with the
same result. Unfortunately I don't have the BasicRX/TX with me and can
not test it. Do you have one of the RFX400 or 2400 with which you
could test?
Thomas
Hi Jan,
I have two USRPs to test with, one a Rev 3 and one a Rev 4.1. Both
have the same behavior, except that one shows version 0.04 and the
other 0.02 when I first plug them in (in the system profiler). Then, I
run test_usrp_standard_tx, the firmware uploads, i.e. the LEDs start
to blink slower
10 matches
Mail list logo
