--- Robert McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this is Master's thesis or a Doctoral
thesis/dissertation?
I am completing a Master's thesis.
> What areas in EE (signal processing, computer
> science, etc.) do you find
> most attractive and most comfortable or where you
> might like to
David Carr wrote:
All this RA talk makes me curious about what a typical RA IF setup
looks like.
Do RA samplers usually employ quadrature sampling (I and Q) or do they
sample
a "real" signal at twice the desired bandwidth? Also, if the big boys
use 1GHz sample rates, what do the little boys u
All this RA talk makes me curious about what a typical RA IF setup looks
like.
Do RA samplers usually employ quadrature sampling (I and Q) or do they
sample
a "real" signal at twice the desired bandwidth?
Also, if the big boys use 1GHz sample rates, what do the little boys
use? 10s or 100s of
>doesn't it look like the USB 2.0 is a heavily constraining bottleneck?>
>
Yes, USB2.0 is the bottleneck.
>And, if I'm not wrong about this, will it be possible in the future to>have a USRP <--> PC interface which doesn't limit us so much.>>
Other than 802.11, there aren't many applications that
Matt Ettus wrote:
Other than 802.11, there aren't many applications that require more
than 8 MHz of bandwidth. Radio astronomy is one, but you can use
fewer bits per sample with RA. It is not uncommon to use 1 or 2 bits
per sample, which would allow you to cover 128 and 64 MHz respectivel
doesn't it look like the USB 2.0 is a heavily constraining bottleneck?
Yes, USB2.0 is the bottleneck.
And, if I'm not wrong about this, will it be possible in the future to
have a USRP <--> PC interface which doesn't limit us so much.
Would something like a dedicated PCI LVDS card be a viable
doesn't it look like the USB 2.0 is a heavily constraining bottleneck?
Yes, USB2.0 is the bottleneck.
And, if I'm not wrong about this, will it be possible in the future to
have a USRP <--> PC interface which doesn't limit us so much.
Other than 802.11, there aren't many applications th
Hi everybody,
this is probably a silly question, but there's one thing i cannot fully
understand.
Considering that the 2 ADCs per channel on the USRP allow complex
samping at 64Msps, and therefore a 64MHz Spectral Bandwidth, and that my
inexpensive PC just needs 45% of CPU calculation power in ord
I need php5. php5-dev wants version 1.4 things because Ubuntu there
is some issue. I could not get aclocal to work unless I forced
aclocal.m4 by hand to call automake-1.9 for example. I got all of these
am python not found and other blow ups leading to complete failure. As
soon as I m
I , too, am an Ubuntu 6.06 user. What were you attempting to fix by modifying gnuradio-core/aclocal.m4?MarkOn 6/26/06, Robert McGwier <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Lamar:I installed Ubunto 5.X and GnuRadio just made and ran after I used apt
(synaptic) to download any package GnuRadio could not find.
Lamar:
I installed Ubunto 5.X and GnuRadio just made and ran after I used apt
(synaptic) to download any package GnuRadio could not find. With Ubunto
6.0X I had to make a modification to aclocal.m4 (and I am sure there
are other ways to fix it) in gnuradio-core but otherwise, it just
comp
Daniel:
I would think we need a bit more information than this. Your request is
a little too wide open. Is this is Master's thesis or a Doctoral
thesis/dissertation? If the latter, does it need to be original work?
What areas in EE (signal processing, computer science, etc.) do you find
On Monday 26 June 2006 11:42, Marcus Leech wrote:
> FC6 is just around the corner--the TEST1 release is already available.
> Sigh.
Yeah, I had sworn I wasn't going to get back on the Fedora roller coaster;
that's why I use CentOS of the servers. But the needs of the bleeding edge
have conspire
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 02:39:32PM -0400, Joanne M Mikkelson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As was discussed here earlier (starting from
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-05/msg00045.html
> in the list archive), BBN has been working on improving the ugen(4)
> driver for NetBSD.
>
>
Hi Daniel,
My name is Chris Roberts, I'm an MS student at Case Western Reserve
University. I'll try to outline my knowledge of the work with GNURadio I
am aware of.
I am currently finishing my thesis on an undergraduate laboratory
curriculum that uses GNURadio and the USRP.
P. Dayal, from th
Hello Everyone,
My name is Daniel Garcia. I'm a electrical engineering
graduate student at Texas A&M University - Kingsville.
This summer and fall I will be working on the thesis
portion of my degree. I am very interested in using my
time/effort to contribute to the GNU Radio project
while meetin
No, we wrote our own async demodulator and slicer.
We'll insert the GNU Radio costas loop later, hopefully soon.
At 02:28 PM 6/26/2006, Dawei Shen wrote:
Hi, Bob
I am just curious about which demodulating method you chose. Is it the
same as the one in the xpsk example directory, i.e. costas loop
Hi all,
As was discussed here earlier (starting from
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2006-05/msg00045.html
in the list archive), BBN has been working on improving the ugen(4)
driver for NetBSD.
We've now implemented the changes to the driver and it's handling
transfer rates of
Hi, BobI am just curious about which demodulating method you chose. Is it the same as the one in the xpsk example directory, i.e. costas loop followed by M&M synchronizer?ThanksDawei
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.
Lamar Owen wrote:
I'm curious as to where you've found Fedora to be unstable, and what you mean
by unstable. If it means "changes too much too quickly" then, yes, Fedora
does do that. It's not unusual to get a couple hundred MB worth of updates
in a week's time. GNUradio compiles and works
On Sunday 25 June 2006 16:48, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 01:40:51PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 01:27:37PM -0400, Marcus Leech wrote:
> > > The status bar indicated "failed to set frequency", which comes as a
> > > result of 'r' being zero on return fro
On Friday 23 June 2006 13:16, Gregg Levine wrote:
> But anyway of the ones you'v mentioned, Ubuntu is good because its
> even easier to use then Debian, which is what it is based on. Mandrake
> was renamed Mandriva because of copyright complaints. Fedora is still
> too unstable. I personally prefer
22 matches
Mail list logo
