I am getting this error when I go to build GNUradio. Any suggestions?
configure: error: gr-audio-osx required darwin or MacOS X
Newell
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradi
Hi,
I was wondering why can the USRP "only" achieve 32 MByte/s, i.e. 256
Mbit/s whereas the USB 2.0 specifications are 480 MBit/s? The 32
Mbyte/s is mentioned in several earlier posts on the gnuradio mailing
list archive and in the BBN report (freebsd section).
One is 'full-speed' and the ot
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Schmid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discuss gnuradio"
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2006 4:49 AM
Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] USB2, 32 MByte/s or 480MBit/s?
Hi,
I was wondering why can the USRP "only" achieve 32 MByte/s, i.e. 256
Mbit/s whereas the USB 2.0 spe
On Friday 16 June 2006 13:19, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> I was wondering why can the USRP "only" achieve 32 MByte/s, i.e. 256
> Mbit/s whereas the USB 2.0 specifications are 480 MBit/s? The 32
> Mbyte/s is mentioned in several earlier posts on the gnuradio mailing
> list archive and in the BBN report (
On 6/15/06 7:06 PM, "Eric Blossom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:37:54PM -0500, Michael Dickens wrote:
>> On Thursday, June 15, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Eric Blossom wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:37:48AM -0400, Michael Dickens wrote:
> My theory on this document
Hi,
I was wondering why can the USRP "only" achieve 32 MByte/s, i.e. 256
Mbit/s whereas the USB 2.0 specifications are 480 MBit/s? The 32
Mbyte/s is mentioned in several earlier posts on the gnuradio mailing
list archive and in the BBN report (freebsd section).
Thanks,
Thomas
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:37:54PM -0500, Michael Dickens wrote:
> On Thursday, June 15, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Eric Blossom wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:37:48AM -0400, Michael Dickens wrote:
> >>
> >>Hmmm ... good point. In a dynamic system, ports could get dropped or
> >>connected "on the fl
Robert Roberts wrote:
> Does GNURadio have a magnitude or absolute value block? I found one
> mentioned in the archives but don't see it in any of the documentation.
gr.complex_to_mag()
It takes a stream of complex samples and outputs a 1 for 1 stream of floats.
-Johnathan
_
Hello,
Does GNURadio have a magnitude or absolute value block? I found one
mentioned in the archives but don't see it in any of the documentation.
Thanks,
~Chris~
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mai
Eric Blossom wrote:
> Please fix the copyright dates ;)
Done.
-Johnathan, AE6HO
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
On Thursday, June 15, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Eric Blossom wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:37:48AM -0400, Michael Dickens wrote:
Hmmm ... good point. In a dynamic system, ports could get dropped or
connected "on the fly". Could you write a quick blurp about this,
somewhere before 4.9? Maybe 4.6
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:37:48AM -0400, Michael Dickens wrote:
>
> Hmmm ... good point. In a dynamic system, ports could get dropped or
> connected "on the fly". Could you write a quick blurp about this,
> somewhere before 4.9? Maybe 4.6.8 or 4.8.6?
>
I think we're approaching the "poli
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:13:52AM -0400, Michael Dickens wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2006, at 2:03 AM, Eric Blossom wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:51:05AM -0400, David Lapsley wrote:
> >>On 6/14/06 2:24 PM, "Michael Dickens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>>p68, 4.8.1; and p74, 4.8.4: How ca
On 6/15/06 8:37 AM, "Michael Dickens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2006, at 12:51 AM, David Lapsley wrote:
>> On 6/14/06 2:24 PM, "Michael Dickens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Also, the whole discussion of packet radio requirements doesn't
>>> really fit into the GR baseline, and sho
Johnathan Corgan wrote:
> Patches and new files for gr_add_const_vXX have been posted to the patch
> list.
A new, cumulative patch for both gr_add_const_vXX and
gr_multiply_const_vXX has been posted to the patch list.
-Johnathan, AE6HO
___
Discuss-gn
On 6/15/06 2:03 AM, "Eric Blossom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:51:05AM -0400, David Lapsley wrote:
>> On 6/14/06 2:24 PM, "Michael Dickens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> p68, 4.8.1; and p74, 4.8.4: How can an m-block have zero ports? I
>>> thought that all data /
On Jun 15, 2006, at 12:51 AM, David Lapsley wrote:
On 6/14/06 2:24 PM, "Michael Dickens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, the whole discussion of packet radio requirements doesn't
really fit into the GR baseline, and should instead probably be in
4.3, or at least elsewhere.
Do you mean 4.5.2?
On Jun 15, 2006, at 2:03 AM, Eric Blossom wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:51:05AM -0400, David Lapsley wrote:
On 6/14/06 2:24 PM, "Michael Dickens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
p68, 4.8.1; and p74, 4.8.4: How can an m-block have zero ports? I
thought that all data / metadata / signals / wha
18 matches
Mail list logo
