Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Problem with making sound card as source

2006-05-14 Thread 2 1
Thanks Breett:) I've solved this problem by turn on capture item in the mixer. And I guess that's why there are many people say that there linux cannot recording sound. Hanwen2006/5/10, Brett L Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I had a similar problem- turned out not to be the hardware.Run alsamixer an

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Modem and/or ADSL Daughter card

2006-05-14 Thread David Young
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:24:07PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote: > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 02:01:31PM -0400, Michael Milner wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I was just wondering if anyone has used GNURadio for any non-radio > > applications, specifically phone line modulation/demodulation. > > > > It shoul

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 'module' object has no attribute

2006-05-14 Thread Lee Patton
Thanks Martin! I was staring at that code for a half hour, and didn't see it. I even grepped 'gr_' to see if it was something like that, and I still didn't see it Thanks for your time. On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 00:55 +0200, Martin Dvh wrote: > Lee Patton wrote: > > I am attempting to build modified v

[Discuss-gnuradio] running

2006-05-14 Thread David Caruth
Hello!   I've just started playing with GnuRadio and the USRP, and was hoping to run it on Windows XP.  I found Martin's installer "setup-gnuradio-complete-2.6cvs.exe" and it worked great.  I then tried to run the example to listen to some radio (I had this running with a fedora core 5 linux inst

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] depad for atsc 2

2006-05-14 Thread Martin Dvh
Charles Swiger wrote: > I just added atsc_depad to cvs gr-atsc. > > The 2.x code worked thru derandomizer, but the output was > atsc_mpeg_packet padded out to 256, which xine/mplayer won't > play. Kludging atsc_mpeg_packet pad to 0 in atsc_types.h > worked with a warning from gnuradio about outpu

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 'module' object has no attribute

2006-05-14 Thread Martin Dvh
Lee Patton wrote: > I am attempting to build modified versions of gr_file_source, and > gr_file_sink outside of gnuradio-core. I have successfully built, and > used my version of file_source (called rad_wvfm_source). However, I > cannot get my version of file_sink (called rad_wvfm_sink) to build i

[Discuss-gnuradio] 'module' object has no attribute

2006-05-14 Thread Lee Patton
I am attempting to build modified versions of gr_file_source, and gr_file_sink outside of gnuradio-core. I have successfully built, and used my version of file_source (called rad_wvfm_source). However, I cannot get my version of file_sink (called rad_wvfm_sink) to build into a module so that it is

[Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Graphical programming with Ptolemy [rather: Deep dependencies]

2006-05-14 Thread Patrick Strasser
John Clark wrote: It seems to becoming an 'annual' event that I setup a GNURadio environment, and this year's candidate machine seems to have almost nothing of the antecedent packeges... This is not exactly the content you would expect from the subject. I know i'm a little late, but shouldn't

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed

2006-05-14 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:13:47AM -0400, Achilleas Anastasopoulos wrote: > > Yes, with -O the STL code is only 1.7 times > slower. > > Even better, with -O2 the two cases execute > in exactly the same time. > > So, is Gnuradio compiling with -O2 > option? Yes. Eric _

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed

2006-05-14 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 09:40:16AM -0400, Achilleas Anastasopoulos wrote: > > I run the following simple test, compiled with > g++ test.cc -o test > and I got the following results. > I see a 4-fold speed reduction using STL. > What am I doing wrong? > > Achilleas You're not using the "standard

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 48KHz audio board

2006-05-14 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 08:37:11AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Sunday 14 May 2006 07:19, Vincenzo Pellegrini wrote: > > my audio board requires 48Ksps > > the fm receiver in gnu radio examples delivers to it 32Ksps instead. > > setting a overall decimation factor of 1320 i can get as near as

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] 48KHz audio board

2006-05-14 Thread Eric Blossom
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 11:49:03PM +0200, Vincenzo Pellegrini wrote: > sorry, i know that the question might be silly but: > > my audio board requires 48Ksps > the fm receiver in gnu radio examples delivers to it 32Ksps instead. > setting a overall decimation factor of 1320 i can get as near as 48

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed

2006-05-14 Thread Achilleas Anastasopoulos
Yes, with -O the STL code is only 1.7 times slower. Even better, with -O2 the two cases execute in exactly the same time. So, is Gnuradio compiling with -O2 option? Achilleas Philip Balister wrote: Try g++ -O test.cc -o test That solved the problem for me. Philip Achilleas Anastasopoul

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] ANCI-C vs Gnuradio/C++ speeeed

2006-05-14 Thread Achilleas Anastasopoulos
I run the following simple test, compiled with g++ test.cc -o test and I got the following results. I see a 4-fold speed reduction using STL. What am I doing wrong? Achilleas --- $ time ./test 1 1 real0m0.121s user0m0.120s sys 0m0.001s while $ time ./t