On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 12:24:30AM +0100, Stephane Fillod wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:26:07AM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote:
>
> I assume you meant 'us' (micro-second), and not micro sample or micro
> Siemens :-)
Definitely micro Siemens!
> Talking about getting to the 32us area, this is wha
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:26:07AM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:18:35AM -0500, Frank Brickle wrote:
> > Eric Blossom wrote:
> >
> > >Using LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19 effectively forces the old (pre-NPTL)
> > >behavior, which means that acquiring an uncontested mutex require
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:34:12PM -0500, Frank Brickle wrote:
> Dave Dodge wrote:
> >You can expect to have to
> >run synaptic several times and keep enabling/installing yet more
> >packages before you'll finally have a reasonably complete set of
> >headers, tools, and documentation -- unless ther
Eric Blossom wrote:
...
I ended up remounting the relevant filesystem as ext2 to avoid the
problem...If we never go to the disk, it might not matter at
all.
> ...
It's been a long time since I looked at these pages:
http://ardour.org/requirements.php
http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/soft
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 02:52:14PM -0500, Frank Brickle wrote:
> Eric Blossom wrote:
>
> >...
> >I ended up remounting the relevant filesystem as ext2 to avoid the
> >problem...If we never go to the disk, it might not matter at
> >all.
> > ...
>
> It's been a long time since I looked at these pag
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 01:59:49PM -0500, Robert McGwier wrote:
> It was **specifically* * the Reiserfs that ran us away from it to the
> less troublesome (at the time) EXT3. Isn't XFS deprecated because of
> all the problems associated with it? I might be wrong but that is what I
> recall.
>
It was **specifically* * the Reiserfs that ran us away from it to the
less troublesome (at the time) EXT3. Isn't XFS deprecated because of
all the problems associated with it? I might be wrong but that is what I
recall.
Bob
-- snip, Eric wants to leave EXT3 for ReiserFS -
--
AM
I digged into the usrp c code, and I have found the following code, that
basically says we could use 32 bits for tuning on the fpga, but we truncate
it to 14 - unless there's a good reason for that, we could be much more
precise in tuning the NCO... again, unless Matt has a good reason for that.
Stephane Fillod wrote:
> Out of curiosity, will we be able to have a peek at the schematics of
> the LFRX&LFTX boards like it is possible for the Basic RX&TX boards at
> http://www.ettus.com/Download.html ?
All the schematics will be up on my web site by Friday.
> Also, there's no pressure inten
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:45:04AM +0100, Matteo Campanella wrote:
> great... this should mean we should be able to test alot of examples
> removing the xlating filter from the chain... I hope to run some tests
> asap; in the meanwhile Eric, what is a good starter example to understand
> how to dec
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 07:56:11AM -0500, Marcus Leech wrote:
> I'm trying to re-sample signals, ranging from 0.5Hz up to about 40Hz,
> sampling them at some small
> integer multiple of their frequency. Simple decimation isn't getting
> close enough, in many circumstances,
> leaving a significa
I am trying to find some information on how to use the two Tx
daughterboards to transmit independent data streams?
In one of the posts,
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2005-10/msg00142.html
Eric said that this can be done by using a "stream with two interleaved
channels of I & Q
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:12:58AM +0100, Matteo Campanella wrote:
> As there is alot of software that takes the soundcard as default source
> for doing digital processing, do you think it would be possible to build a
> virtual sound card device driver to be used as sink from gnuradio and as
> sign
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:46:54AM -0500, Frank Brickle wrote:
> Eric Blossom wrote:
>
> >>Bottom line, it hasn't actually been proved that running SCHED_FIFO will
> >>squash the existing latency and continuity problems, so I'm not at all
> >>sure much is missing without that capability.
> >
> >
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:42:56PM +0100, Matteo Campanella wrote:
> I also meant a gnuradio example, eg. some block that does this already or
> almost ;-)
> > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:45:04AM +0100, Matteo Campanella wrote:
> >> great... this should mean we should be able to test alot of exampl
Eric Blossom wrote:
Bottom line, it hasn't actually been proved that running SCHED_FIFO will
squash the existing latency and continuity problems, so I'm not at all
sure much is missing without that capability.
Frank, is this a statement or a question?
It's a statement. I don't have any rea
Yes, an example will be very helpful.
Thanks,
Satashu
Eric Blossom wrote:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 02:21:55AM -0500, Satashu Goel wrote:
I am trying to find some information on how to use the two Tx
daughterboards to transmit independent data streams?
In one of the posts,
http://lists.gnu.o
I'm trying to re-sample signals, ranging from 0.5Hz up to about 40Hz,
sampling them at some small
integer multiple of their frequency. Simple decimation isn't getting
close enough, in many circumstances,
leaving a significant phase erorr.
I'm thinking that I can get closer using the rationa
As there is alot of software that takes the soundcard as default source
for doing digital processing, do you think it would be possible to build a
virtual sound card device driver to be used as sink from gnuradio and as
signal source from one of these softwares?
I mean, a virtual sound card driver
19 matches
Mail list logo
