Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Windows Port Error

2006-01-19 Thread Robert Roberts
Ok, the Opteron Saga continues. After installing it by hand I still get a circular buffer error. C:\gnuradio-examples-0.4\python\audio>dial_tone.py gr_vmcircbuf_mmap_createfilemapping: non contiguous mmap - 012D 0004 0131 gr_vmcircbuf_mmap_createfilemapping: non contiguou

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] d_usb_data_rate

2006-01-19 Thread mgray
In the context of GNU radio it probably meant, Scientific Wild Ass Guess On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Stuff We All Get = SWAG > > i.e. Handouts > > Vy 73; > > Bob > w9ya > > > > SWAG -- basically a guess. See > > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=swag (usage

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USB Issues

2006-01-19 Thread Brian Dunn
Hi Eric - Even without modifying the code, I get a few errors when trying to compile the verilog: Error (10001): Verilog HDL or VHDL error at halfband_interp.v(37): object "signal_out_i" declared in a List of Port Declarations cannot be redeclared within the Module Body Error (10001): Verilog HDL

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Windows Port Error

2006-01-19 Thread Robert Roberts
When I run the installer it fails to run the GNURadio-core install. It installs the following packages in the following order: USRP USRP_prims gr_usrp gr-audio-windows gr-wxgui I'll grab the package and install by hand, just an FYI Thanks! ~Chris~ - Original Message - From: Martin Dvh

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] USB Issues

2006-01-19 Thread Eric Blossom
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:02:04PM -0500, Brian Dunn wrote: > Hi Eric - > > Even without modifying the code, I get a few errors when trying to > compile the verilog: Hmmm, I'll check and see if something has changed. Maybe it's a 5.0 vs 5.1 issue. Eric _

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] d_usb_data_rate

2006-01-19 Thread w9ya
Stuff We All Get = SWAG i.e. Handouts Vy 73; Bob w9ya > SWAG -- basically a guess. See > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=swag (usage 2) > > Regards, > > Bill > > > At 06:56 PM 1/18/2006, David R. Palchak wrote: > >> <> >> The comment on the >>line simply says "// SWAG".