> 1) noise_ave_pwr.jpg
> * normalized average power over time
> * is there any reason why the power would start high then go low?
The first samples could be corrupted because the pipeline may not be
cleared. Drop the first samples
> 2) noise_ave_psd.jpg
> * average PSD of a chun
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 06:46:57PM +0100, Martin Dvh wrote:
> Eric Blossom wrote:
> > We also had a problem where one of the resets was
> > resetting the register that contained the resets... That was why
> > initializing the Rx was hosing the Tx, or vice-versa (don't recall
> > which way it wen
Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:54:16PM +0100, Martin Dvh wrote:
>
>>The new halfbandfilter stuff broke the debug_counter.
>>I think this minipatch is the solution.
>>I found this because I also use a counter in the fpga and it broke when I
>>updated my sourcetree.
>
>
> Thanks
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 04:54:16PM +0100, Martin Dvh wrote:
> The new halfbandfilter stuff broke the debug_counter.
> I think this minipatch is the solution.
> I found this because I also use a counter in the fpga and it broke when I
> updated my sourcetree.
Thanks!
> I also wonder why all the r
MEA CULPA! I did miss it. We are in complete agreement.
Bob
Martin Dvh wrote:
Robert McGwier wrote:
This is not quite right. The DIFFERENT oscillators on the USRP boards
have different frequencies and thus constantly changing phase angle with
respect to each other and with probability
In addition to Matt's answer let me add a few remarks. A few years
ago, while working with Tom Clark at Goddard Space Flight Center (Tom
is an astrophysicist), I was asked to look at some Kalman Filtering
routines for his VLBI work. MANY years later, I desperately needed to
make widely pl
The new halfbandfilter stuff broke the debug_counter.
I think this minipatch is the solution.
I found this because I also use a counter in the fpga and it broke when I
updated my sourcetree.
I also wonder why all the resets are removed.
Are all the registers reset in another way now?
Greetings,
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 08:39:01PM +, sudhindra aithal kota wrote:
> Hi,
> In my mail I have mentioned that I did try with
> frequencies greater than 100Khz. But the behaviour was
> the same as I had originally reported.
>
> Regards
> Sudhindra
Did you try and turn off the automatic dc offs
Ah, that makes sense! Thanks for the clue-in.
BTW, I didn't see your response come though the list... does the list
engine not send one emails already cc'd to one?
Thanks,
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Ettus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 4:51 PM
Robert McGwier wrote:
> This is not quite right. The DIFFERENT oscillators on the USRP boards
> have different frequencies and thus constantly changing phase angle with
> respect to each other and with probability 1, the frequencies of both
> oscillators will change with changing temp, air flow, e
10 matches
Mail list logo
