On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 05:40:08PM -0400, Lee Patton wrote:
> I am happy to report that FFTW can be built with --enable-sse under
> Fedora Core 3 using gcc 3.4.4.
>
> Ignore the rest if this has never been a problem for you...
>
> I originally built FFTW with gcc 3.4.2, and ran into the same prob
Me too. I created a new mount point at /proc/bus/usb
with usbfs for a regular 'user'account and now I am
able to talk to the usrp with the very first command.
Ahh..such a relief ! Thanks for all your pointers.
Javs
--- Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:01:42A
I am happy to report that FFTW can be built with --enable-sse under
Fedora Core 3 using gcc 3.4.4.
Ignore the rest if this has never been a problem for you...
I originally built FFTW with gcc 3.4.2, and ran into the same problem as
these fine folks:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnur
On Friday 28 October 2005 17:21, Eric Blossom wrote:
> Matt's come up with a new FPGA bitstream file that looks like it fixes
> the weirdness for decimation==10, and flattens out the decimation==8
> case.
Better, yes, on decim=8. About 2dB down at +/-3MHz. Good 6MHz 2dB bandwidth,
and not as st
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 03:42:37PM -0400, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On Friday 28 October 2005 13:19, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > Generally speaking, having to run as root reflects a permission problem
> > on /proc/bus/usb/ and files below. The fix is distribution
> > dependent.
>
> Well, I'll admit to run
Matt's come up with a new FPGA bitstream file that looks like it fixes
the weirdness for decimation==10, and flattens out the decimation==8
case.
You can find the new file at
http://comsec.com/usrp/usrp_fpga_rev2_2005_10_28.rbf
... or miracle of miracles, it will now be installed automatically
On Friday 28 October 2005 13:19, Eric Blossom wrote:
> Generally speaking, having to run as root reflects a permission problem
> on /proc/bus/usb/ and files below. The fix is distribution
> dependent.
> On FC2, I know that the mount command didn't honor the perms and gid
> mount options to usbfs
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:20:44AM +0200, Stephane Fillod wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:34:04PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> [...]
> > > 2) Can SDCC 2.5.0 be used, or is 2.4.0 an absolute must?
> >
> > I haven't tested with SDCC 2.5.0.
>
> SDCC 2.5.0 seems to be fine here (Debian/unstable
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:15:53PM -0400, Lee Patton wrote:
> Eric -
>
> I've attached the gdb back trace you asked for.
Thanks! I really appreciate it when others jump in.
> (gdb) c
> Continuing.
> [New Thread -179336272 (LWP 11020)]
> [New Thread -190067792 (LWP 11021)]
> [Thread -190067792 (
Woops! a little copy and paste error. The line should have been
everything inside the quotes:
"usbfs /proc/bus/usb usbfs devgid=500,devmode=0664 0 0"
Thanks to Robert Kelley for pointing that out.
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 12:57 -0400, Lee Patton wrote:
> Mike -
>
> I guess you set your USB p
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:01:42AM -0600, Robitaille, Michael wrote:
> Finally got GNU Radio compiled and working with the USRP so I am out of the
> wood for now.
Great!
> I installed it in the 'standard' location, unfortunately I could do that
> only as the root and I can only run GnuRadio as ro
Mike -
I guess you set your USB permissions per:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2005-02/msg00285.html
Basically, adding the following line (without the quotes) to /etc/fstab:
"usbfs /proc/bus/usb usbfs devgid=500,devmode=0664 0 0"ode=0664 0
h
with "500" changed to the
Eric -
I've attached the gdb back trace you asked for.
Also, I used pdb in an attempt to debug the python code. I found:
1) usrp_oscope.py:
* app.Mainloop() never returns (you could have guessed that)
2) stdgui.py:
* self.Destroy() in the OnCloseWindow method does return
* pu
Finally got GNU Radio compiled and working with the USRP so I am out of the
wood for now.
I installed it in the 'standard' location, unfortunately I could do that
only as the root and I can only run GnuRadio as root. I can't even use
'sudo' to run usrp_oscope.py.
Not sure if I should move
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:34:04PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
[...]
> > 2) Can SDCC 2.5.0 be used, or is 2.4.0 an absolute must?
>
> I haven't tested with SDCC 2.5.0.
SDCC 2.5.0 seems to be fine here (Debian/unstable).
Talking about usrp_oscope.py, I get also this message when doing
File->Exi
15 matches
Mail list logo
