Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Trouble with TV Rx boards

2005-06-30 Thread dromza
Robert - Sorry I confused you, I was not so clear. I have the Basic RX daughterboard installed in slot RX A, and that is what I used to get the wfm_rcv_gui.py to work. I just tried that out to make sure the USRP was working. But I installed the TV Rx board in slot RX B. To Lamar - I believe th

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Gigabit Design Proposal

2005-06-30 Thread John Gilmore
A critical parameter will be the response time (latency) required on the host. This is largely controlled by the amount of bufferring on the GITD. Pushing in the opposite design direction is the desire to minimize latency and cost on the GITD itself. A memory-mapped interface is great for softwa

[Discuss-gnuradio] Problems with building the gnuradio core

2005-06-30 Thread esilvers
I’m getting errors from building the gnuradio core. When I run make I get the following: . . . /usr/include/gcc/darwin/3.3/c++/bits/localefwd.h:180: error: template with C linkage In file included from /usr/include/gcc/darwin/3.3/c++/bits/stl_algobase.h:71, from /usr/include/g

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Trouble with TV Rx boards

2005-06-30 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 19:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I recently received a TV Rx board. My usrp works with wfm_rcv_gui.py but I > have been trying to simply run tvrx_wfm_rcv_gui.py with the TV > daughterboard and I receive this error: Which version? You may need to specify which side in t

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Bandswitch and rf gain added to HF Explorer

2005-06-30 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday 29 June 2005 19:44, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: > I meant to mention earlier in reference to the filter and the tradeoff > between skirts and CPU usage -- have you looked at the filtering scheme > used in the Flex-Radio SDR-1000 software? I don't recall the exact > details right now, b

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Xlib problem help request

2005-06-30 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:51, Stevie wrote: > > That is really not a very good idea for security reasons.. > > Which is correct. Using > > xhost LOCAL: > > has a similar effect but only opens your X server up to connections > originating on your local machine. Didn't know about the LOCAL: tag - that

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Xlib problem help request

2005-06-30 Thread Stevie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Daniel wrote: > You probably just need to grant all processes access to your X > server. > >> Here's the magic command-line incantation: >> >> xhost + > > > That is really not a very good idea for security reasons.. Which is correct. Usi

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] gnuradio-core make check fails

2005-06-30 Thread Mark S Petrovic
Ges, This background may help http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2005-06/msg00214.html If you have not already solved your problem, do this as root $ find / -name libpython\* and send me the output off-list. We'll see if we can give you a workaround. Mark On 28Jun, Ges wrote

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Xlib problem help request

2005-06-30 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 21:15, Stuart Brorson wrote: > > Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server > > Xlib: No protocol specified > > You probably just need to grant all processes access to your X server. > Here's the magic command-line incantation: > > xhost + That is really not a very good idea

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Xlib problem help request

2005-06-30 Thread Stuart Brorson
> > I completed a build with no obvious errors from tarballs, but I get an error > when running applications that I hope someone can help with. I am using a > debian system that began with a Knoppix HD install. The error messages are > as follows: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ward# cd > /usr