I get the following error when I 'make'
I am using gcc-3.2.3 and Python2.3. How can I fix it?
Thanks in advance.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gnuradio-core-2.5]$ make
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/sheikh/gnuradio-core-2.5'
Making all in config
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/shei
There was earlier some discussion surrounding why Numeric cannot be
found during the build tests
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnuradio/2005-04/msg00135.html
The problem is manifested by a console message to the effect
ImportError: No module named Numeric
I encountered the same prob
> The other thought is that if you are considering putting the peripheral
> remotely close to an outdoor antenna, perhaps an optical fiber solution
> would be better - why risk frying your CPU or your body?
Copper GigE is sufficiently cheap and ubiquitous that a DAC/ADC board
should use it. But
Though GigE sounds like a good idea to pursue, has anyone thought about
using 2 or more USB 2 interfaces as an alternative? I don't know what
the typical controller interfaces can handle, but I see three on my
AMD64-based laptop, plus a firewire interface - that's potentially about
1.6 Gb/sec
I have not seen this message once on mine.
Bob
Marcus D. Leech wrote:
Matt likely isn't back from his trip to Green Bank yet, but I've observed that
with
the DBS_RX, using dbs_debug, that it complains whenever you go to set a
frequency
that "VCO failed to lock at x" appears.
Since th
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 12:40:06PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:10:35PM -0700, John Gilmore wrote:
> > What thruput do YOU see using a good GigE card under Linux? Can you move
> > 100 Mbytes/sec from user process to user process with TCP, across two GigE
> > interfaces a
fyi
Offered as a data point for this platform, for contemporary users or
those of posterity...
Building from CVS for this platform
Linux cq 2.6.11-gentoo-r11 #3 Sat Jun 18 20:11:08 PDT 2005 i686 Pentium III
(Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
gcc v3.4.4
runs an equivalent test
$
Matt likely isn't back from his trip to Green Bank yet, but I've observed that
with
the DBS_RX, using dbs_debug, that it complains whenever you go to set a
frequency
that "VCO failed to lock at x" appears.
Since that particular operation is the only one that seems to get actively
tested f
First, the FM gui has new creature comforts - programmable station
buttons and ability to save the audio to a file (can be piped to
lame for mp3 output).
http://webpages.charter.net/cswiger/spectrum_gauges/
Not a show stopper but I noticed that closing, then trying to open an
output file a 2nd ti
Hello,
I am trying to determine what the throughput is with my
configuration. I am trying to accomplish this by inputting
a sinusoid and writing it to a file. Having never dealt with
binary files, I am now stuck on reading in values from this
file to see if there are any discontinuities. Below
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 12:40:06PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:10:35PM -0700, John Gilmore wrote:
> > I'm picking up the Gigabit Ethernet conversation from a few weeks ago.
>
Me too.
Please, add your inputs to the following page:
http://comsec.com/wiki?USRPnot
Harald Welte wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:10:35PM -0700, John Gilmore wrote:
> > I'm picking up the Gigabit Ethernet conversation from a few weeks ago.
>
> great :)
>
>
> I didn't state (or at leat want to state) that it was impossible to
> achieve multiple-gigabit data rates with the L
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 04:10:35PM -0700, John Gilmore wrote:
> I'm picking up the Gigabit Ethernet conversation from a few weeks ago.
great :)
> > I'm by no means arguing that the linux network stack is slow. It's just
> > not intended for an application which just wants to get big data stream
13 matches
Mail list logo
