I built FFTW with
./configure --prefix=$HOME/gr --enable-single --enable-shared
and wxPython-src-2.5.4.1.tar.gz
under Red Hat FC 3 with all updates (using up2date) and it now runs all
the gnuradio-examples
It looks like there is some sort of problem in libfftw3f with the SSE
instructions. I'
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 05:39:35PM -0700, John Clark wrote:
>
> >I just checked out the most recent CVS sources, using the procedure:
>
> I then updated my version of 'autoconfig', and 'automake' to be the most
> recent on ftp.gnu.org, and got the following: (truncated for brevity
> sake...),
>
John Clark wrote:
I just checked out the most recent CVS sources, using the procedure:
I then updated my version of 'autoconfig', and 'automake' to be the most
recent on ftp.gnu.org, and got the following: (truncated for brevity
sake...),
but ultimately ending with a message to the effect of need
I just checked out the most recent CVS sources, using the procedure:
got gr-build
then
using the 'checkout' found in gr-build, got the rest.
From there I used './for-all-dirs ../build' in the gr-build directory.
I got this set of messages:
./for-all-dirs ../buildit
>>> /home/GNURadio/gr-build/gnura
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 01:24:39PM -0500, LRK wrote:
>
> Makefile.in in the tarballs and made via CVS with FreeBSD shows the
> "rm" command as "-rm" is some places.
Thanks for the feedback. In the meanwhile, try gmake instead of make.
Eric
___
Disc
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 01:09:52PM -0700, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 01:24:39PM -0500, LRK wrote:
> >
> > Makefile.in in the tarballs and made via CVS with FreeBSD shows the
> > "rm" command as "-rm" is some places.
>
> Thanks for the feedback. In the meanwhile, try gmake ins
I'm using an Athlon XP 2400. Just wondering if it would matter if I
built fftw with --enable-3dnow, below was taken from fftw faq. Which
brings me to 2nd question. Is there some standard benchmarking code
someone has or on cvs?
Question 2.5. What's the difference between |--enable-3dnow|
Makefile.in in the tarballs and made via CVS with FreeBSD shows the
"rm" command as "-rm" is some places.
This is something apparently pulled from the Automake .am files and
prevents "make clean" and other clean functions from working.
Is this different on Linux? (i.e. Linux handles -rm as rm)
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 11:44:21PM -0700, Sachi wrote:
> Hi, Eric
>
> Toby's suggestion helped me solve the problem. If I
> configure "without" the --enable-sse option, then
> everything works well. Is --enable-sse option
> necessary here?
It's only necessary if you want it to go fast...
[For mos
Hello,
I've put my output of strace in this file (~.5 Megs)
http://www.eng.morgan.edu/~rcobo/fedora/file
As you can see there is alot going on behind the screen. I am using the
ssrp board but that may not be the fault. Somewhere at the end you will
see a system call to poen a file that does not
I have update the webpage for simple USB 2.0 ADC board:
http://volodya-project.sourceforge.net//SR/sr.php
Changes:
* explain where and how to get the example firmware
* add utility to fx2_programmer to display waveform and fft
of byte stream captured from a USB end
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:03:48PM -0800, Sachi wrote:
> Hi, Eric
>
> I have checked it with gdb, it returned:
>
> (gdb) continue
> Continuing.
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread -1208514880 (LWP 1030)]
> 0x007eb73f in m2fv_64_0 () from
> /usr/local/l
Hello,
I am still getting a segmentation fault with that configuration. 'make
check' passed fine. Could it be another call to another library, maybe GUI
related?
I thought someone previously said that the library runs ok in FC3 without
GUI.
Rafael
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Eric Blossom wrote:
> O
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:11, LRK wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:54:14PM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 07:11:52PM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > > Is there a reason to use bash instead of sh, which is pretty standard
> > > across all UNIX-like systems made in the past 15 ye
Hello,
I tried that configuration but still no duck. What version are you using?
Are you able to run the gui example where you see the spectrum?
Rafael
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Toby Oliver wrote:
> Hi Sachi,
>
> I had a similar problem running Fedora Core 3 as a vmware guest (i.e.
> segmentation
Hi,
Mine also works. I tried before without --enable-sse and it didn't work
(actually, I was using --disable-sse), but it does now (only using
--enable-shared --enable-single). I am very glad this is working now.
Thanks Toby.
Rafael
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Sachi wrote:
> Hi, Eric
>
> Toby's sugge
Hi, Eric
Toby's suggestion helped me solve the problem. If I
configure "without" the --enable-sse option, then
everything works well. Is --enable-sse option
necessary here?
Thanks to you guys
Sachi
--- Eric Blossom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:03:48PM -0800, Sachi
> w
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 09:41:38AM -0500, LRK wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:54:14PM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 07:11:52PM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > > Is there a reason to use bash instead of sh, which is pretty standard
> > > across all UNIX-like systems made i
18 matches
Mail list logo