yimeng zhao mailto:exahe...@gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 at 8:08 AM
To: Alexander Shalimov mailto:ashali...@arccn.ru>>
Cc: "discuss@openvswitch.org <mailto:discuss@openvswitch.org>"
mailto:discuss@openvswitch.org>>
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] p
rg>"
mailto:discuss@openvswitch.org>>
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] pps throughput depending on the number of flows
Could you specify your configuration of measurement?
2014-09-02 22:54 GMT+02:00 Alexander Shalimov
mailto:ashali...@arccn.ru>>:
Hi,
We recently finished with throughput
Could you specify your configuration of measurement?
2014-09-02 22:54 GMT+02:00 Alexander Shalimov :
> Hi,
>
> We recently finished with throughput measurements of OVS. We saw that
> phy-to-phy throughput became higher with the increasing number of flows:
> #1. 1 flow, phy-to-phy, 64 bytes packe
Vasmi
From: discuss on behalf of Alexander Shalimov
Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 1:54 PM
To: discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: [ovs-discuss] pps throughput depending on the number of flows
Hi,
We recently finished with throughput measurements of OVS. W
Hi,
We recently finished with throughput measurements of OVS. We saw that
phy-to-phy throughput became higher with the increasing number of flows:
#1. 1 flow, phy-to-phy, 64 bytes packets => 1Mpps
#2. 32 flows (1 src ip, 32 dst ips), phy-to-phy, 64 bytes packets => 9Mpps
Could anyone explain w
