or the OVS part, see
> this thread http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2015-July/018095.html
>
>
>
> Kevin.
>
>
>
> *From:* Na Zhu [mailto:zhunat...@gmail.com ]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 15, 2015 6:16 AM
> *To:* Traynor, Kevin
> *Subject:* Re: [ovs-discuss]
:* Wednesday, July 15, 2015 6:16 AM
*To:* Traynor, Kevin
*Subject:* Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance is not good
Hi Kevin,
The interface MTU is 1500, the TCP message size is 16384 and the UDP
message size is 65507.
How to use DPDK virtio PMD?
in DPDK virtio PMD, it uses mergeable feature to
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance is not good
Hi Kevin,
The interface MTU is 1500, the TCP message size is 16384 and the UDP message
size is 65507.
How to use DPDK virtio PMD?
2015-07-14 20:25 GMT+08:00 Traynor, Kevin
mailto:kevin.tray...@intel.com>>:
From: discuss
[mailto:d
From: gowrishankar [mailto:gowrishanka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 8:38 AM
To: Traynor, Kevin
Cc: Na Zhu; b...@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance is not good
Hi Kevin,
On Tuesday 14 July 2015 05:55 PM, Traynor, Kevin wrote:
[kt] I would
Hi Kevin,
On Tuesday 14 July 2015 05:55 PM, Traynor, Kevin wrote:
[kt] I would check your core affinitization to ensure that the vswitchd
pmd is on a separate core to the vCPUs (set with
other_config:pmd-cpu-mask).
I hope you mean host CPUs. Is that right ?
Also, this test is not using t
Tuesday 14 July 2015 05:55 PM, Traynor, Kevin wrote:
*From:*discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] *On Behalf Of
*Na Zhu
*Sent:* Monday, July 13, 2015 3:15 AM
*To:* b...@openvswitch.org
*Subject:* [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance is not good
Dear all,
I want to use ovs-dpdk to
From: discuss [mailto:discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Na Zhu
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 3:15 AM
To: b...@openvswitch.org
Subject: [ovs-discuss] ovs-dpdk performance is not good
Dear all,
I want to use ovs-dpdk to improve my nfv performance. But when i compare the
throughput
Dear all,
I want to use ovs-dpdk to improve my nfv performance. But when i compare
the throughput between standard ovs and ovs-dpdk, the ovs is better, does
anyone know why?
I use netperf to test the throughput.
use vhost-net to test standard ovs.
use vhost-user to test ovs-dpdk.
My topology is a
