On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 01:51:02AM +, Wuhongning wrote:
> < I don't think there's a need to fork anything to run one vswitchd with a
> < given datapath provider and a second vswitchd with a different one.
>
> so, whether newly developed ofproto provider lib and netdev provider
> lib could be i
< I don't think there's a need to fork anything to run one vswitchd with a
< given datapath provider and a second vswitchd with a different one.
so, whether newly developed ofproto provider lib and netdev provider lib could
be inserted into the running vswitchd process in production environment
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 04:03:23AM +, Wuhongning wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 03:52:42AM +, Wuhongning wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:21:53AM +, Wuhongning wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:41:13PM +, Wuhongning wrote:
> >> >> >> if we have a hardware chip with r
From: Ben Pfaff [b...@nicira.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:55 AM
To: Wuhongning
Cc: discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] coexistence of ofproto-dpif and customized ofproto
provider
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 03:52:42AM +
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 03:52:42AM +, Wuhongning wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:21:53AM +, Wuhongning wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:41:13PM +, Wuhongning wrote:
> >> >> if we have a hardware chip with rich networking feature, and want to
> >> >> expose as a enhanced flow s
From: Ben Pfaff [b...@nicira.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:43 AM
To: Wuhongning
Cc: discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] coexistence of ofproto-dpif and customized ofproto
provider
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:21:53AM +
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 01:21:53AM +, Wuhongning wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:41:13PM +, Wuhongning wrote:
> >> if we have a hardware chip with rich networking feature, and want to
> >> expose as a enhanced flow switch. at the same time, we also want to
> >> keep the standard ovs, so
hi, Ben
thanks for your reply, and below is some feedback
From: Ben Pfaff [b...@nicira.com]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 11:49 PM
To: Wuhongning
Cc: discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] coexistence of ofproto-dpif and customized ofproto
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:41:13PM +, Wuhongning wrote:
> if we have a hardware chip with rich networking feature, and want to
> expose as a enhanced flow switch. at the same time, we also want to
> keep the standard ovs, so what's the best practice to let them work
> together without bother ea
if we have a hardware chip with rich networking feature, and want to expose as
a enhanced flow switch. at the same time, we also want to keep the standard
ovs, so what's the best practice to let them work together without bother each
other?
basically, we don't want to touch the original vswitc
Wuhongning 编写：
it's not related to a single hybrid ofproto, but coexistence of multiple
ofprotos.
if we have a hardware chip with rich networking feature, and want to expose as
a enhanced flow switch. at the same time, we also want to keep the standard
ovs, so what's the best practice to l
11 matches
Mail list logo
