Re: [ovs-discuss] Use OVS without VM

2012-12-10 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:07:33AM -0300, Lucas Brasilino wrote: > > Please keep this on the list. > > By the way, there's a configuration, in mailman, that makes it insert > a 'Reply-To:' header > pointing to the list. Doing so will avoid personal replies. We don't do it that way. See http://ww

Re: [ovs-discuss] Use OVS without VM

2012-12-10 Thread Lucas Brasilino
Hi: > Please keep this on the list. By the way, there's a configuration, in mailman, that makes it insert a 'Reply-To:' header pointing to the list. Doing so will avoid personal replies. I don't remenber where this configuration is located at mailman admin interface... I haven't touched it for m

Re: [ovs-discuss] Use OVS without VM

2012-12-10 Thread Justin Pettit
Please keep this on the list. Yes, moving the IP address to the bridge is covered in the FAQ: http://openvswitch.org/faq/ If you want to bridge the traffic, I imagine you want to attach something else to the bridge, like another interface such as eth1. --Justin On Dec 10, 2012, at 12

Re: [ovs-discuss] Use OVS without VM

2012-12-10 Thread Justin Pettit
That works fine. You can just create a bridge and then attach your physical devices to it (e.g., eth0 and eth1). OVS doesn't really make a distinction between physical and virtual interfaces. --Justin On Dec 9, 2012, at 10:57 PM, Игорь Рыжов wrote: > The standart use of OVS is to connect h

[ovs-discuss] Use OVS without VM

2012-12-10 Thread Игорь Рыжов
The standart use of OVS is to connect host adapters with OVS and connect OVS with virual machines adapters. But I want to use OVS as a layer between host and host's adapters. I didn't find anything about this way of OVS use. Can anybody explain how to do that or provide some links?