On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:44:49PM +1200, Tony van der Peet wrote:
> I want to propose that we should wrap free() just like the other memory
> allocation routines are. In other words, create an xfree() in util.c and
> call that instead of free().
No.
> Reasons for doing this are:
>
> - consisten
While I have been following this list for a while, I am not totally up to
speed with the ins and outs of contributing to the cause.
I want to propose that we should wrap free() just like the other memory
allocation routines are. In other words, create an xfree() in util.c and
call that instead of
