nope.. this wasn't on OVS.. it was on the native xen bridge... but if OVS
only supports native since yesterday, then the Xen issue seems logical :)
Leland
Le 27/09/2011 22:11, « Jesse Gross » a écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Leland Vandervort
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jesse,
>>
>>
>>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Leland Vandervort
wrote:
>
> Hi Jesse,
>
>
> Could this be somewhat related to an issue that we spotted recently in Xen
> whereby traffic sent from the hypervisor node tagged the traffic with the
> VLAN ID, but since that VLAN is also the native VLAN for the trunk
Hi Jesse,
Could this be somewhat related to an issue that we spotted recently in Xen
whereby traffic sent from the hypervisor node tagged the traffic with the
VLAN ID, but since that VLAN is also the native VLAN for the trunk-port, the
switch simply didn't tag it (assuming that the device knew
It's already updated but that only helps for future releases of the
distributions.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Doude wrote:
> Ok, thanks a lot Jesse. I'll compile a newer version.
> Do you plan to update debian/ubuntu package ?
> Doude.
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
Ok, thanks a lot Jesse. I'll compile a newer version.
Do you plan to update debian/ubuntu package ?
Doude.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Doude wrote:
> > Ha yes, I miss that.
> >
> > Here log you asked, in my test I worked on VLAN id 100
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Doude wrote:
> Ha yes, I miss that.
>
> Here log you asked, in my test I worked on VLAN id 1001:
>
> - OVS ping sender:
> tun_id0 in_port2 tci(0) macaa:aa:00:00:01:12->ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> type0806 proto1 tos0 ip10.0.0.1->10.0.0.2 port0->0, packets:50,
> bytes:2100,
Ha yes, I miss that.
Here log you asked, in my test I worked on VLAN id 1001:
- OVS ping sender:
tun_id0 in_port2 tci(0) macaa:aa:00:00:01:12->ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
type0806 proto1 tos0 ip10.0.0.1->10.0.0.2 port0->0, packets:50,
bytes:2100, used:0.610s, actions:set_tci(vid=1001,pcp=0),0,1
- OVS ping
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Doude wrote:
> I tried the 'ovs-vlan-test' program and it failed.
> Server log:
> 172.16.0.143 - - [26/Sep/2011 15:58:24] "GET /start/recv HTTP/1.1" 200 -
> 172.16.0.143 - - [26/Sep/2011 15:58:24] "GET /result/15 HTTP/1.1" 404 -
> 172.16.0.143 - - [26/Sep/2011 15:5
I tried the 'ovs-vlan-test' program and it failed.
Server log:
172.16.0.143 - - [26/Sep/2011 15:58:24] "GET /start/recv HTTP/1.1" 200 -
172.16.0.143 - - [26/Sep/2011 15:58:24] "GET /result/15 HTTP/1.1" 404 -
172.16.0.143 - - [26/Sep/2011 15:58:24] "GET /result/15 HTTP/1.1" 404 -
172.16.0.143 - - [2
Hi,
Just to up my problem, I always need help.
Do you think it could be a driver incompatibility ?
I remember, I already do that conf a year ago. I used other hardware
with drivers r8169, e1000e and tg3 (only 2 of them but I don't
remember which ones).
Here my OVS setup:
# modprobe openvswitch_m
I've got two Ethernet cards: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II
BCM5708S Gigabit Ethernet
They use the driver bnx2 version 2.0.21 on kernel 2.6.38.
I make some tcpdump. In the first test case, if I tcpdump the Host2
NIC, I can see ARP request encapsulated in VLAN 1000, but If snif the
tap of VM2,
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Doude wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I try to use OpenVswitch on Ubuntu 11.04 with packages
> 1.1.0~pre2.g2.ea763e0e-1ubuntu2.
>
> I've got 2 hosts(Host1 and host2). I set a OVS bridge 'br0' on the hosts.
> I put 'eth1' of each host in the OVS bridge 'br0' without tag (tagge
Hi all,
I try to use OpenVswitch on Ubuntu 11.04 with packages
1.1.0~pre2.g2.ea763e0e-1ubuntu2.
I've got 2 hosts(Host1 and host2). I set a OVS bridge 'br0' on the hosts.
I put 'eth1' of each host in the OVS bridge 'br0' without tag (tagged).
I create tap on each host and add it to OVS bridge 'br
13 matches
Mail list logo
