On 1/24/14 8:36 AM, "Flavio Leitner" wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:40:11PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/22/14 4:10 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:04:48PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 1/22/14 3:23 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:40:11PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>
>
> On 1/22/14 4:10 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:04:48PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/22/14 3:23 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 08:17:05PM +, McGa
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:36 PM, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>
> On 1/22/14 6:30 PM, "Gurucharan Shetty" wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Where can I find that? I installed OVS from an rpm. I ran rpm -qlp on
>>> the package and I didn't see the kernel module. Do I need to build it?
>>
>>Where did you get your RPMS
On 1/22/14 6:30 PM, "Gurucharan Shetty" wrote:
>>
>> Where can I find that? I installed OVS from an rpm. I ran rpm -qlp on
>> the package and I didn't see the kernel module. Do I need to build it?
>
>Where did you get your RPMS from? Did you build it?
>
>RHEL comes with a default OVS kernel m
>
> Where can I find that? I installed OVS from an rpm. I ran rpm -qlp on
> the package and I didn't see the kernel module. Do I need to build it?
Where did you get your RPMS from? Did you build it?
RHEL comes with a default OVS kernel module. I think you are using it.
Each OVS version comes
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:54:25PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>
>
> On 1/22/14 4:42 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:40:11PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/22/14 4:10 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:04:48PM +, McGa
On 1/22/14 4:42 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:40:11PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/22/14 4:10 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:04:48PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 1/22/14 3:23 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>> >>
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:40:11PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>
>
> On 1/22/14 4:10 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:04:48PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/22/14 3:23 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 08:17:05PM +, McGa
On 1/22/14 4:10 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:04:48PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/22/14 3:23 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 08:17:05PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 1/22/14 12:44 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>> >>
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:04:48PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>
>
> On 1/22/14 3:23 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 08:17:05PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/22/14 12:44 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:39:14AM -0800, Ben
On 1/22/14 3:23 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 08:17:05PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/22/14 12:44 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:39:14AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 05:35:40PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 08:17:05PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>
>
> On 1/22/14 12:44 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:39:14AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 05:35:40PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 1/21/14 6:17 PM, "Ben Pf
On 1/22/14 12:44 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:39:14AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 05:35:40PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 1/21/14 6:17 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>> > >I'd expect a dramatic drop in CPU consumption in that case. The
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 09:39:14AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 05:35:40PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/21/14 6:17 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
> > >I'd expect a dramatic drop in CPU consumption in that case. There are
> > >a few special cases where the upgrade
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 05:35:40PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
>
>
> On 1/21/14 6:17 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
> >I'd expect a dramatic drop in CPU consumption in that case. There are
> >a few special cases where the upgrade wouldn't help. One is if
> >in-band control is in use, another is if N
On 1/21/14 6:17 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>Please don't drop the mailing list.
My apologies for dropping the mailing list.
>
>I'd expect a dramatic drop in CPU consumption in that case. There are
>a few special cases where the upgrade wouldn't help. One is if
>in-band control is in use, anothe
Please don't drop the mailing list.
I'd expect a dramatic drop in CPU consumption in that case. There are
a few special cases where the upgrade wouldn't help. One is if
in-band control is in use, another is if NetFlow is turned on, a third
is if LACP bonds with L4 port based hashing are turned o
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:50:30PM +, McGarvey, Kevin wrote:
> I am sending UDP DNS queries to a KVM guest through Open vSwitch
> running on the RHEL hypervisor. With traffic of only 5K
> request/response pairs per second the CPU consumption of the
> ovs-vswitchd process is over 60%. The sourc
I am sending UDP DNS queries to a KVM guest through Open vSwitch running on the
RHEL hypervisor. With traffic of only 5K request/response pairs per second the
CPU consumption of the ovs-vswitchd process is over 60%. The source IP and port
change with each request, simulating normal UDP DNS traf
19 matches
Mail list logo
