On 15.10.2015 18:01, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> It looks like the supported methods are "" (to use the default) or
> "hash", to use the fields specified in "fields".
Okay, I am using the following group:
group_id=88,type=select,selection_method=hash,fields=ip_dst,bucket=bucket_id:0,actions=set_field:00:5
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:57:37AM +0200, Daniel Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On 29.09.2015 06:15, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:11:26PM +0200, Daniel Herrmann wrote:
> >> I am trying to load-balance traffic in a routed scenario and want to use
> >> OF group tables for this.
> >
Hi Ben,
On 29.09.2015 06:15, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:11:26PM +0200, Daniel Herrmann wrote:
>> I am trying to load-balance traffic in a routed scenario and want to use
>> OF group tables for this.
>>
>> However, it seems that only one bucket is selected. I found some thread
>>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 09:11:26PM +0200, Daniel Herrmann wrote:
> I am trying to load-balance traffic in a routed scenario and want to use
> OF group tables for this.
>
> However, it seems that only one bucket is selected. I found some thread
> from mid 2014, which states that only eth_dst is use
Hi,
I am trying to load-balance traffic in a routed scenario and want to use
OF group tables for this.
However, it seems that only one bucket is selected. I found some thread
from mid 2014, which states that only eth_dst is used for matching:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2014-August/
