On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:41:19PM +, ma...@lamehost.it wrote:
> September 6, 2016 4:33 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 02:20:18PM +, ma...@lamehost.it wrote:
> >
> >> I would like to know if there are plans to augment
> >> FLOW_MAX_MPLS_LABELS (and all the data stru
September 6, 2016 4:33 PM, "Ben Pfaff" wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 02:20:18PM +, ma...@lamehost.it wrote:
>
>> I would like to know if there are plans to augment
>> FLOW_MAX_MPLS_LABELS (and all the data structures that depend on it)
>> to larger values.
>
> This is the first inquiry I
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 02:20:18PM +, ma...@lamehost.it wrote:
> I would like to know if there are plans to augment
> FLOW_MAX_MPLS_LABELS (and all the data structures that depend on it)
> to larger values.
This is the first inquiry I've heard.
___
d
Dear members of the community,
I would like to know if there are plans to augment FLOW_MAX_MPLS_LABELS (and
all the data structures that depend on it) to larger values.
These days the Linux kernel is able to handle up to 2 labels and there are
plans to go up to 8 in the next months.
Please chec
