Re: [ovs-discuss] Coverage counter subfacet_install_fail

2014-08-03 Thread Han Zhou
Alex, On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Alex Wang wrote: > Hey Han, > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Han Zhou wrote: >> >> Hi Alex, >> >> We had to upgrade to OVS2.1, and everything looks much better. >> The flow miss rate decreased from 20K/sec to 1.5K/sec, which means in >> OVS2.0 there

Re: [ovs-discuss] Coverage counter subfacet_install_fail

2014-07-31 Thread Alex Wang
Hey Han, On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Han Zhou wrote: > Hi Alex, > > We had to upgrade to OVS2.1, and everything looks much better. > The flow miss rate decreased from 20K/sec to 1.5K/sec, which means in > OVS2.0 there was problem of creating datapath flows (indicated by the > counter subfa

Re: [ovs-discuss] Coverage counter subfacet_install_fail

2014-07-31 Thread Alex Wang
Hey Han, Sorry for this delayed reply, Please see my comments inline, On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Han Zhou wrote: > Hi Alex, > > In our environment this counter subfacet_install_fail increases > quickly about 100/sec. > Could you show me some ovs-vswitchd.log ? there should be warnin

Re: [ovs-discuss] Coverage counter subfacet_install_fail

2014-07-31 Thread Han Zhou
Hi Alex, We had to upgrade to OVS2.1, and everything looks much better. The flow miss rate decreased from 20K/sec to 1.5K/sec, which means in OVS2.0 there was problem of creating datapath flows (indicated by the counter subfacet_install_fail), which then resulted in high miss rate and high OVS cpu

[ovs-discuss] Coverage counter subfacet_install_fail

2014-07-30 Thread Han Zhou
Hi Alex, In our environment this counter subfacet_install_fail increases quickly about 100/sec. Could you help tell what could be the reasons, and what would be the impact? This is OVS2.0. (We would like to upgrade, but not this moment in that production environment, so it would be good to underst