Can some one point to me example flow rules that can be added to learn the
mac adresses where traffic non-vlan. I went through the Open Vswitch
tutorial which has the details of implementing mac learning with VLAN's,
but not sure how to do it for non-vlan capable switch.
TIA,
Murali
__
I am using OpenVswicth 1.4.6 version in XenServer 6.2. I see that patch
ports does not have ofport. Is this expected behaviour?
Bridge "xapi9"
fail_mode: standalone
Port "t545-4-1"
Interface "t545-4-1"
type: gre
options: {key="545", re
Thanks Ben. How bad it can get in versions prior to 1.10? I want to build
a solution with patch ports with XenServer 6.2 which has 1.4.6 OVS version.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 09:42:16PM +0530, murali reddy wrote:
> > Are there
Are there any known performance issues (latency or throughput) with using
patch ports? I would like to interconnect multiple bridges (corresponding
to different subnets) with patch port to a bridge configured with the flows
to acts as router. I am wondering if there would be any performance if i
us
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Can you just insert OpenFlow rules into the switch with matches for
> specific L2 addresses, outputting to a port?
>
>
yes, i can insert flows to learn the mac and output on a port based on
learned mac address. But was wondering if OpenVswitc
Can some one please help with the question? I could not find a way from the
documentation.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 11:20 AM, murali reddy wrote:
> I have use-case where I want exclude a port from both flooding and from
> mac-learning as well. Solution mentioned in [1][2] will achieve
I have use-case where I want exclude a port from both flooding and from
mac-learning as well. Solution mentioned in [1][2] will achieve what i
want. But i do not want to flood the packets on all the ports but would
like to go through the L2 lookup to avoid flooding. One way is i can
implement mac-
Thanks Ben. That works for me.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:40:04AM +0530, murali reddy wrote:
> > For a flow with NORMAL action, in case of unknown MAC address, i believe
> > packets get flooded on all ports. Is there a way i
For a flow with NORMAL action, in case of unknown MAC address, i believe
packets get flooded on all ports. Is there a way i can define flow rule
with NORMAL action yet exclude certain ports from flooding the packet?
Thanks
Murali
___
discuss mailing list
