Re: [ovs-discuss] Could someone tell me how to shorten recovery time after a bonded port failed?

2016-03-01 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi Andy, Thanks a lot! Best regards! ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks From: Andy Zhou Date: 2016-03-02 04:22 To: zhangzhiming CC: discuss Subject: Re: Re: [ovs-discuss] Could someone tell me how to shorten recovery time after a bonded port failed? On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:19 AM

Re: [ovs-discuss] Could someone tell me how to shorten recovery time after a bonded port failed?

2016-03-01 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi Andy, Could you help me answer another question? Have you tested the performance of OVS with an extra bridge and patch port? Thanks! Best regards! ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks From: ZHANG Zhiming Date: 2016-02-26 09:56 To: Andy Zhou CC: discuss Subject: Re: Re: [ovs-discuss] Could

Re: [ovs-discuss] Could someone tell me how to shorten recovery time after a bonded port failed?

2016-02-25 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi Andy, Perfect! This also give me a hint for solving other problems. Thank you very much! Best regards! ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks From: Andy Zhou Date: 2016-02-26 05:24 To: zhangzhiming CC: discuss Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Could someone tell me how to shorten recovery time after

[ovs-discuss] Could someone tell me how to shorten recovery time after a bonded port failed?

2016-02-25 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Thanks a lot! ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks 发件人: ZHANG Zhiming 发送时间: 2016-02-23 21:35 收件人: discuss 主题: One question about ofport number of a bond port and learned output port number Hi, Could someone tell me how to shorten recovery time after a bonded port failed? When two physical ports

[ovs-discuss] One question about ofport number of a bond port and learned output port number

2016-02-23 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
utput:NXM_OF_IN_PORT[]) If all packets from a vm named VM1 are transmitted on eth0, when eth0 failed, the lacp can detect the failure quickly, while the learned flows need to be updated after receiving a new arp packet from the physical port eth1. Z

Re: [ovs-discuss] Where is the document for some matching fields and actions

2015-12-23 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi Ben, Thanks again! It's necessary for me to update to latest version. Best regards, ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks From: Ben Pfaff Date: 2015-12-24 14:39 To: ZHANG Zhiming CC: discuss Subject: Re: Re: [ovs-discuss] Where is the document for some matching fields and actions On Thu

Re: [ovs-discuss] Where is the document for some matching fields and actions

2015-12-23 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi Ben, Thanks for your help! Does it mean that no future works are planned for the document of NXM fields? Another field named metadata also cannot be found in document. Best regards, ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks From: Ben Pfaff Date: 2015-12-24 05:21 To: ZHANG Zhiming CC: discuss

[ovs-discuss] Where is the document for some matching fields and actions

2015-12-23 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi, Recently, I found some matching fields or actions of OVS are used in openstack, but no documents are found in 'man ovs-ofctl', 'man ovs-appctl' or 'man ovs-dpctl' etc. Such as arp_op=1, load:2->NXM_OF_IN_PORT[]. Could someone help me find o

[ovs-discuss] 回复: 回复: Could someone help me to confirm whether this is a bug of ovs or not?

2015-12-06 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi, Is it a bug of Linux kernel? https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8191 ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks 发件人: ZHANG Zhiming 发送时间: 2015-12-06 20:35 收件人: discuss 主题: 回复: Could someone help me to confirm whether this is a bug of ovs or not? Hi, When I closed some offloadings of ovs bridge

[ovs-discuss] 回复: Could someone help me to confirm whether this is a bug of ovs or not?

2015-12-06 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
loopback: off [fixed] rx-fcs: off [fixed] rx-all: off [fixed] tx-vlan-stag-hw-insert: off [fixed] rx-vlan-stag-hw-parse: off [fixed] rx-vlan-stag-filter: off [fixed] ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks 发件人: ZHANG Zhiming 发送时间: 2015-12-06 20:10 收件人: discuss 主题: Could someone help me to confirm

[ovs-discuss] Could someone help me to confirm whether this is a bug of ovs or not?

2015-12-06 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
] [] ? fib_table_lookup+0x2e6/0x390 [ 6676.521708] [] SYSC_sendto+0x121/0x1c0 [ 6676.521711] [] ? __schedule+0x2d8/0x7b0 [ 6676.521713] [] SyS_sendto+0xe/0x10 [ 6676.521715] [] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 6676.521716] ---[ end trace 9eb243d0b823fed8 ]--- ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan

Re: [ovs-discuss] ipfix leads to kernel crash

2015-11-09 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi Gross, That works! Thank you very much! Best regards, ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks From: Jesse Gross Date: 2015-11-09 20:20 To: zhangzhiming CC: discuss Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] ipfix leads to kernel crash This is the relevant commit: https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit

Re: [ovs-discuss] ipfix leads to kernel crash

2015-11-08 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi Gross, Thank you very much. You save me so much time. The version of OVS may not be changed due to some reasons. So I have to fix it on versoin 2.31. Could you tell me which patch solved this bug? I checked a commit logs, and found no clues. Best regards, ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks

[ovs-discuss] ipfix leads to kernel crash

2015-11-02 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi, Could someone help me check this kernel crash? I set ipfix to send report to a collector, and the kernel crashed after several hours. Thanks! ovs-vsctl (Open vSwitch) 2.3.1 Compiled Aug 11 2015 05:18:30 DB Schema 7.6.2 kernel version: 3.10.0-123.el7.x86_64 crash> bt PID: 1614 TASK:

Re: [ovs-discuss] one patch was omitted to be pushed to branch-2.3---datapath: Fix recirc bug where skb is double freed

2015-06-15 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi,Andy, Thanks for your response. We did some local changes to Linux kernel and OVS. I will do more tests to narrow it down according to your advice, and let you know if I have any further progress. Thanks again! ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks From: Andy Zhou Date: 2015-06-16 13:34 To

Re: [ovs-discuss] one patch was omitted to be pushed to branch-2.3---datapath: Fix recirc bug where skb is double freed

2015-06-13 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi, Andy, Do you need any other information to figure out this problem? ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks From: Andy Zhou Date: 2015-05-27 10:13 To: zhangzhiming CC: Alex Wang; discuss Subject: Re: Re: [ovs-discuss] one patch was omitted to be pushed to branch-2.3---datapath: Fix recirc bug

Re: [ovs-discuss] one patch was omitted to be pushed to branch-2.3---datapath: Fix recirc bug where skb is double freed

2015-05-27 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
Hi, Andy, Could you reproduce this bug? ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks From: Andy Zhou Date: 2015-05-27 10:13 To: zhangzhiming CC: Alex Wang; discuss Subject: Re: Re: [ovs-discuss] one patch was omitted to be pushed to branch-2.3---datapath: Fix recirc bug where skb is double freed On Sun

Re: [ovs-discuss] one patch was omitted to be pushed to branch-2.3---datapath: Fix recirc bug where skb is double freed

2015-05-26 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
d:1.002s, flags:P., actions:1 ZHANG Zhiming Yunshan Networks From: Andy Zhou Date: 2015-05-27 10:13 To: zhangzhiming CC: Alex Wang; discuss Subject: Re: Re: [ovs-discuss] one patch was omitted to be pushed to branch-2.3---datapath: Fix recirc bug where skb is double freed On Sun, May 24,

Re: [ovs-discuss] one patch was omitted to be pushed to branch-2.3---datapath: Fix recirc bug where skb is double freed

2015-05-26 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
p;rwlock); +} /* Rebalancing. */ @@ -1203,7 +1213,7 @@ bond_rebalance(struct bond *bond) } if (use_recirc && rebalanced) { -bond_update_post_recirc_rules(bond,true); +bond_update_post_recirc_rules__(bond,true); } done: -- 1.9.1 ZHANG Zhiming Yunsha

Re: [ovs-discuss] one patch was omitted to be pushed to branch-2.3---datapath: Fix recirc bug where skb is double freed

2015-05-24 Thread ZHANG Zhiming
nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) 0xa04862b8 :mov%rbx,%rdi 0xa04862bb :callq 0x814c06f0 0xa04862c0 :mov%r12d,%eax 0xa04862c3 :jmp0xa0486298 0xa04862c5 :callq 0xffff8105dc20 <__stack_c