Alright. Thank you for the info Jesse!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Vjekoslav Brajkovic
> wrote:
> > I can't reduce the number of hops. We're doing large scale emulations
> using
> > topologies that are
mber of hops that you have. I
> don't know what your goal is but your current design is extremely
> inefficient.
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Vjekoslav Brajkovic
> wrote:
> > Would you happen to know what needs to be patched in order to
> > modify/remove thi
Would you happen to know what needs to be patched in order to
modify/remove this behavior?
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Vjekoslav Brajkovic
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I ran into this problem and I think it might
oblem.
Thanks for your help!
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:35:57PM -0700, Vjekoslav Brajkovic wrote:
>> I'm running into a problem that should not be happening. According to
>> the ovs-dpctl manpage, a single machine may
Hi,
I'm running into a problem that should not be happening. According to
the ovs-dpctl manpage, a single machine may host up to 256 datapaths
(numbered 0 to 255).
I'm successively creating a switch and specifying the same controller
for each of them. In a nutshell:
for n in nodes: # length(no
UE Nicira extension action to set the queue, followed by
> OFPAT_OUTPUT to send the packet.
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:57:27PM -0700, Vjekoslav Brajkovic wrote:
> > We're doing some large-scale quality of service experiments on EC2
> > using OVS. Since we do not have
te limit traffic between a VM and the
underlying hypervisor.
Hope this makes sense.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:09:41PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:07:22PM -0700, Vjekoslav Brajkovic wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:56:11AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> &g
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:56:11AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> It's because OpenFlow 1.0 says that the port in ofp_action_enqueue
> should "refer to a valid physical port (i.e. < OFPP_MAX) or
> OFPP_IN_PORT." OFPP_LOCAL isn't either of those.
In that case, I'll redirect my question to openflow-spec
Hello,
I was wondering if someone could help me with a specific issue that I
have ran into. I'm running a virtual switch with two interfaces:
system@sw:
lookups: frags:0, hit:296581, missed:355, lost:12
flows: 0
port 0: sw (internal)
port 1: tap0
All I'm doing here is forwarding traffi
Hello.
I've noticed that the latest OVS release has support for QoS and was
wondering if someone could answer couple of questions.
1) Are there any examples out there that would help me understand its
use-cases? So far the only thing I've managed to find was this
link: http://openvswit
10 matches
Mail list logo
