Re: [ovs-discuss] [BUG?] FlowRemoved Messages are not being sent

2015-12-10 Thread Seyed Hossein Mortazavi
The controller was not setting the OFPFF_SEND_FLOW_REM flag for flows, after fixing that on the controller, OVS worked as expected and FLOW_REMOVED packets were seen. -H On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Seyed Hossein Mortazavi < mortaz...@ualberta.ca> wrote: > I'm also seeing th

Re: [ovs-discuss] [BUG?] FlowRemoved Messages are not being sent

2015-12-09 Thread Seyed Hossein Mortazavi
I'm also seeing the same problem for OVS v2.5.90 On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:11 AM, Seyed Hossein Mortazavi < mortaz...@ualberta.ca> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using this version of OVS: > ovs-vswitchd (Open vSwitch) 2.4.0 > > Compiled Oct 16 2015 09:22:3

[ovs-discuss] [BUG?] FlowRemoved Messages are not being sent

2015-12-09 Thread Seyed Hossein Mortazavi
27;t see a FlowRemoved message sent out by OVS on my controller or on Wireshark. I'm using OF1.3. Is this a bug? -- Seyed Hossein Mortazavi ___ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [ovs-discuss] Changing FLOW_MAX_MPLS_LABELS

2015-12-04 Thread Seyed Hossein Mortazavi
Nevermind, I just kept increased it 4 bytes at a time until it worked(compiled) at 232. BUILD_ASSERT_DECL(offsetof(struct flow, igmp_group_ip4) + sizeof(uint32_t) == sizeof(struct flow_tnl) + 232 && FLOW_WC_SEQ == 31); On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Seyed Hossein Mortazavi

[ovs-discuss] Changing FLOW_MAX_MPLS_LABELS

2015-12-03 Thread Seyed Hossein Mortazavi
) == sizeof(struct flow_tnl) + 216 && FLOW_WC_SEQ == 31); What should I put instead of 216? In the previous post it mentioned + 176 + (4 * ROUND_UP(FLOW_MAX_MPLS_LABELS, 2)) but that was for the time where there was a 192 instead of 216. - Seyed Hossein M

Re: [ovs-discuss] Implementation of mpls using ovs (2.3.1)

2015-11-29 Thread Seyed Hossein Mortazavi
tended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy > this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of > this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be > transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any > attachments for the presence of v

Re: [ovs-discuss] MPLS push - OVS 2.4

2015-09-08 Thread Seyed Hossein Mortazavi
Hi, I made it work by running the switches in userspace: sudo ovs-vsctl set bridge s1 datapath_type=netdev protocols=OpenFlow13 I'll try re-installing everything to see if I can make it work in kernel mode. On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Seyed Hossein Mortazavi < mortaz...@ualberta.c

Re: [ovs-discuss] MPLS push - OVS 2.4

2015-09-08 Thread Seyed Hossein Mortazavi
1:20 PM, Joe Stringer wrote: > Are you using the openvswitch DKMS module that comes with OVS-2.4 or > the openvswitch module that comes with Linux-3.11? > > On 7 September 2015 at 15:36, Seyed Hossein Mortazavi > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm running OVS 2.4 on

Re: [ovs-discuss] MPLS push - OVS 2.4

2015-09-07 Thread Seyed Hossein Mortazavi
not the intended recipient (or > authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by > reply email and delete all copies of this message. > > Please click here > <http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html> for > Company Regist

[ovs-discuss] MPLS push - OVS 2.4

2015-09-07 Thread Seyed Hossein Mortazavi
Hi, I'm running OVS 2.4 on Ubuntu 14.04 with Kernel 3.11. I'm trying to add MPLS headers (and then pop them) to IP packets. My topology looks like: h1---s1---s2---s3---h2 I've statically already configured the switches such that they would have rules for ARP installed. However adding the rule: