m not sure that either approach is all
> that generic though.
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Matt Kassawara
> wrote:
> > Jesse,
> >
> > I know this sounds too easy, but can we just tell OVS about the
> underlying
> > physical network MTU via confi
>
> >> From: Jesse Gross
> >> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> >> Cc: Matt Kassawara , discuss
> >> , Thomas Graf
> >> Date: 05/06/2016 11:11 AM
> >
> >
> >> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] MTU considerations for OVN
> >>
>
Stack implementation of
OVN doesn't use DPDK.
Matt
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Matt Kassawara
> wrote:
> > Jesse,
> >
> > We can raise the MTU of the underlying network until it reaches the
> maximum
> >
I looked within the last couple of months... most of them stick with stable
branches or are stale.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
> Is anyone aware of an Ubuntu PPA based on the master branch of OVS?
> Someone is interested in using one for OVN testing,
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
huge selling point, at least for OpenStack.
Matt
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Matt Kassawara
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Conventional OpenStack Networking service (neutron) drivers such as Open
> > vSwitch a
Hi,
Conventional OpenStack Networking service (neutron) drivers such as Open
vSwitch and Linux bridge have a long history of MTU issues involving
overlay networks. For example, consider the following typical virtual
network architecture:
1) A provider network using native Ethernet or 802.1q taggi
