Hi,
I am trying to use the "ovs-ofctl mod-port switch port " command to
bring down the patch port I have on my switch . I am using the patch port
to create a link between two switches. I am using ovs 2.1 version.
When I use the command "ovs-ofctl mod-port br1 port1 down" the patch port
on switch
Thanks for checking. I will try to find out more about the ovs installed on
my system.
KP
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 01:34:07PM -0500, Krishna Pratap wrote:
> > Im not sure what is wrong with ovs installed with my system yet. its
>
f wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:28:27AM -0500, Krishna Pratap wrote:
> > Is it possible to set the MAC address of the local port of bridge( not
> the
> > address of bridge itself) with a fixed address?
> >
> > I tried couple of ways to do it. one of them m
Hi,
Is it possible to set the MAC address of the local port of bridge( not the
address of bridge itself) with a fixed address?
I tried couple of ways to do it. one of them mentioned here in this old
thread
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2011-June/005297.html
i tested this one out but i
ot;. were you pointing
out the incorrect port number? or anything else you would like to
highlight. ?
cheers
KP
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 04:37:42PM -0500, Krishna Pratap wrote:
> > ovs-ofctl -O OpenFlow13 add-flow br0
> > in_port=9,actio
Hi,
Im trying to add a flow which modifies the traffic source IP adress before
sending the packet-in to the controller and the flow wouldn't apply.
My switch is set to start with OF1.3 and im using ovs2.1 version. here are
the commands and the output .
ovs-vsctl add-br br
chd log level with
> e.g. "ovs-appctl vlog/set vconn" then looking for OpenFlow flow_mod
> messages in the vswitchd log.
>
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:04:16PM -0400, Krishna Pratap wrote:
> > So here is the monitor output in two cases.
> >
> > 1) when the control
n Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:49:19AM -0400, Krishna Pratap wrote:
> > The switches would delete the traffic flows or any flow that i add on it
> > if it is not connected to controller from the beginning or if I remove
> > t
:54:21PM -0400, Krishna Pratap wrote:
> > I am encountering a condition where the traffic flows gets deleted when
> the
> > switches are not connected to controller.
> > while adding the flows, I make the idle_timeout=0,hard_timeout=0
> >
> > and this is the flow on
Hi all,
I am encountering a condition where the traffic flows gets deleted when the
switches are not connected to controller.
while adding the flows, I make the idle_timeout=0,hard_timeout=0
and this is the flow on the switch
root@ccpu:~# ovs-ofctl dump-flows Switch_S1
NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4)
Hi,
I wanted to confirm if handling or actual processing of packet-out by ovs
switches is done only at handle_packet_out() function in ofproto.c file.
I am experimenting with packet-out processing and wanted to know if there
are any other places in ovs code apart from this where the actual
proces
oesn't need a
> real solution.
>
> You can use veths, I think.
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 01:42:20PM -0400, Krishna Pratap wrote:
> > Yea I saw that but my question is ...should I be changing that? I am sort
> > of new to ovs. is there any other way to connect switc
?
Thanks for all the input! Im learning a lot
KP
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> You can increase MAX_RESUBMIT_RECURSION in ofproto-dpif-xlate.c.
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 01:22:55PM -0400, Krishna Pratap wrote:
> > yes Ben, you maybe right. I saw it in log file
e, but the
> recursion is limited to 64 levels, hence the issue you're seeing.
>
--
Best Regards,
Krishna Pratap Singh
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
have seen
> any check like that.
>
> fbl
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:23:13PM -0400, Krishna Pratap wrote:
>> i dont know how i didnt recevie the first email from Duy.
>>
>> this is the original query
>> http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/discuss/2
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:06:46PM -0400, Krishna Pratap wrote:
>> exactly, i have been wondering the same. do you know where this check
>> is done the code? it doesnt forward anything after 65 hops
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>
TTL doesnt seems to be the problem. i have considered that. anyhow if
you check the traffic in the output that i posted the TTL is set as
255. Also i dont think TTL should matter if we are forwarding packets
at layer 2.
I am guessing there is a check somewhere in OVS code which limits it.
if anyo
Hi,
I am trying to create a linear topology of 70 switches and linking all
these switches with patch ports. After this, I am injecting traffic
packets in the first switch(S0) and I have added flows on all of the
switches to forward the packets in one direction towards the last
switch (S69). I am u
18 matches
Mail list logo
