On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:30:43 -0800,
b...@nicira.com wrote
in E-mail "Re: [ovs-discuss] About multiple ovs-vsctl execution":
> You don't need to resubmit it, but it would save me a small amount of
> time if you did.
I submitted the patch to ovs-dev.
Thanks,
Hello Ben,
To reflect this fix to repository, should I submit patch
although the patch was recreated by you? (If I should,
I'd like to submit it to ovs-dev as a formal patch.)
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014 04:01:04 +,
aj...@mxw.nes.nec.co.jp wrote
in E-mail "Re: [ovs-discuss] About multiple
Yes, your patch also solved my problem.
Thanks,
Ken
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:24:27 +,
b...@nicira.com wrote
in E-mail "Re: [ovs-discuss] About multiple ovs-vsctl execution":
> > When two ovs-vsctl update map type column at same time,
> > one ovs-vsctl's update will be discarded a
Hello,
When two ovs-vsctl update map type column at same time,
one ovs-vsctl's update will be discarded although all
ovs-vsctl succeeded.
I attached a script that reproduce this issue.
(I test it on OVS 1.10.2)
This issue looks like that be resolved by attached patch.
Is this fix
dr = IPPROTO_FRAGMENT;
break;
}
}
-
In original code, FLOW_NW_FRAG_LATER is specified alone but
it looks like that it should be specified together with FLOW_NW_FRAG_ANY.
* Any other information that you think might be relevant.
28 Feb 2012 09:00:48 -0800,
b...@nicira.com wrote
in E-mail "Re: [ovs-discuss] Unexpected flow entry expiration":
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 02:25:34PM +0900, Ken Ajiro wrote:
> >2. I added 7,000 flow entries to switch by ovs-ofctl.
> > Each entries have
same time.
I looked return value of odp_flow_cmd_fill_info() @ datapath.c
when running this test. It was failed in EMSGSIZE error.
I'm thinking that large statistics information should
be split into suitable size of netlink messages.
Thanks,
--
Ken Ajiro
datas.tar.gz
Descript
