On 10/16/2013 07:47 AM, Henning Rogge wrote:
> I know the problems receiving and sending packets through a wifi
> interface, but that is not directly related to my current problem.
>
> I try to understand why my connection through the ethernet interface to
> the local port of the o
On 10/15/2013 07:09 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 03:29:06PM +0200, Henning Rogge wrote:
>> Now I want to add the second interface to the ovs bridge, but as soon as
>> I run "add-port br0 wlan0" I loose connectivity to the services on the
>> bridge
e services on the
bridge through interface eth0.
I still have connectivity through interface wlan0 (and its IP address).
How can I keep connectivity connectivity through eth0 when I add wlan0
to the bridge?
Henning Rogge
--
Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
Kom
quot; logic is completely done with
OpenVSwitch rules, this makes it easier to duplicate this "have a local
port" for other daemons.
Henning Rogge
--
Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE
Kommunikationssystem
o tie adding support for IPv6 controllers to adding
*in-band* support for IPv6 controllers. You could ignore them and
just return 0.
Not sure what you mean with "in-band" support.
Henning Rogge
--
Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
Kommunikation, Informationsv
change of the stream abstraction library would be
reasonably contained within the library, or will this spread out through
the rest of openvswitch?
Henning Rogge
--
Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergonomie FKIE
penvswitch 1.9.0) and came to
the conclusion that IPv6 is not supported to connect the switch with the
database/controller.
Is this true? If yes, is it a design choice?
Henning Rogge
--
Diplom-Informatiker Henning Rogge , Fraunhofer-Institut für
Kommunikation, Informationsverarbeitung und Ergo
