Can you take snapshots of flows in the kernel at different moments in time
(when everything is OK and it is not) using the dpctl utility (ovs-dpctl) ?
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Valentine Sinitsyn
> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We are observing strange OVS behavior in some of our setups.
Thank you very much for the explanation !!
That’s exactly the answer I was looking for :-)
> On Jul 17, 2016, at 11:34 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 11:07:17PM +0100, D3c3 Balus wrote:
>> I’d like to understand the difference between these 2 actions:
>&
Hello,
I’d like to understand the difference between these 2 actions:
actions=set_field:1.1.1.1->nw_dstvs. actions=mod_nw_dst:1.1.1.1 ?
In my understanding, the end result is the same, but what would be different ?
Yes, I have read about the differences between set_field:value and load:va
vs-ofctl add-flow br0
> "in_port=3,ct_state=+trk,ct_zone=1,tcp,tp_src=80,action=2"
>
> Do you know what shall I do for the mac address being translated?
>
> Thanks and BR/
>
> From: D3c3 Balus [mailto:d3c3ba...@gmail.com <mailto:d3c3ba...@gmail.com>]
>
, length 28
>
> So the arp is not being translated.
>
> Do you have any idea?
>
> Thanks.
>
> From: D3c3 Balus [mailto:d3c3ba...@gmail.com <mailto:d3c3ba...@gmail.com>]
> Sent: jueves, 07 de julio de 2016 14:25
> To: Cristina Palomo Regidor <ma
ernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has
> 172.16.1.4 tell 172.16.1.1, length 28
> 14:05:53.169157 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has
> 172.16.1.4 tell 172.16.1.1, length 28
> 14:05:54.171330 ARP, Ethernet (len 6), IPv4 (len 4), Request who-has
> 172.16
Hello,
Your first flow “in_port=4, ip, ….” matches only IP traffic, but ARP is not
matched. You need another rule like “in_port, arp, actions….” to translate
also ARP.
Cheers,
DC
> On Jul 7, 2016, at 11:36 AM, Cristina Palomo Regidor
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I would appreciate any help on th
everybody !
> On Jul 5, 2016, at 4:45 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 1:34 PM, D3c3 Balus wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I’m using 2 Ubuntu Xenial 16.04 LTS with the following:
>> - kernel: 4.4.0-28-generic
>> - OVS version: 2.5.0 (inst
Hello,
I’m using 2 Ubuntu Xenial 16.04 LTS with the following:
- kernel: 4.4.0-28-generic
- OVS version: 2.5.0 (installed from ubuntu packages: openvswitch-common &
openvswitch-switch)
I’m configuring a GRE tunnel between OVS bridges running on each of the
machines with:
ovs-vsctl add-port
).
After increasing the MTU on the physical link between the boxes / hypervisors,
the iperf tests are still very bad: 3.21 Mbits/sec
Thanks,
DC
> On Jul 4, 2016, at 9:34 PM, D3c3 Balus wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I’m using 2 Ubuntu Xenial 16.04 LTS with the following:
> - kernel
Hello,
I’m using 2 Ubuntu Xenial 16.04 LTS with the following:
- kernel: 4.4.0-28-generic
- OVS version: 2.5.0 (installed from ubuntu packages: openvswitch-common &
openvswitch-switch)
I’m configuring a GRE tunnel between OVS bridges running on each of the
machines with:
ovs-vsctl add-port
11 matches
Mail list logo
