Hi,
I am trying to follow the OVSDB multi-threading patch discussed back in March
(http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2016-March/067130.html). Appears this did
not make it in. Anyone know the reasons why?
-shad
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@open
, 2015 9:08 PM
> To: Ansari, Shad
> Cc: Saurabh Shrivastava (सौरभ श्रीवास्तव); discuss@openvswitch.org
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Scaling ovsdb-idl's update notification
>
> If that's useful for real applications, and more practical, then I'm all
> for it. I h
. Typically, the uuid
or indexes should be sufficient information for the client to take action.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@nicira.com]
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 9:51 AM
To: Saurabh Shrivastava (सौरभ श्रीवास्तव)
Cc: Ansari, Shad; discuss@openvswitch.org
Subject: Re
Ovsdb-idl notifies a client that "something" changed; it does not track "what"
changed. The client then typically either reconfigures itself by scanning the
idl to determine what changed, or - simply reloads the entire idl. This
presumably works since the ovs schema tables aren't typically larg
