n kvm, so I'd like to test using the same xen version.
Thanks,
Alex Wang,
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Adam Mazur <mailto:adam.ma...@tiktalik.com>> wrote:
Hi Alex,
Comparing version b6a3dd9cca (Nov 22) to 64bb477f05 (6 Oct) memory
still grows up, but much slower. O
-vswitchd
10:51:16: 217844 ovs-vswitchd
10:51:17: 217844 ovs-vswitchd
What is also specific:
We use only OpenFlow1.0 controller.
Running `ovs-vsctl list Flow_Table` gives empty output.
Best,
Adam
W dniu 03.12.2014 o 12:14, Adam Mazur pisze:
I will try on current head version.
Meanwhile, answers are b
10.2.7.10.0.0.0 UG 0 00 xenbr0
10.2.7.00.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 xenbr0
10.30.7.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 ib0
37.233.99.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 xapi4
Thanks,
Alex Wang,
Hi,
We are testing on kernel 3.18, ovs current master, gre tunnels / xen
server. Following python script leads to fast ovs-vswitchd memory grow
(1GB / minute) and finally OOM kill:
import random, socket, struct, time
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
while True:
ip_
Hi OVS Team,
We are using almost newest version of OVS (master branch, pulled on the
14th of November) under Xen. There is no difference in datapath version
- tested on both kernel (3.17) module and with OVS-dkms version. There
is no difference if using a controller or not.
The problem is: w
