[ovs-discuss] Somebody making --user and dpdk compatible again?

2016-01-25 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi, to avoid missing another work already been done (and google didn't find me anything). Is there already work going on to get --user and dpdk working together? (see http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-September/060382.html) Background: While setting up a vhost_user based ovs-dpdk setup I'm

Re: [ovs-discuss] Quagga and OpenvSwitch

2016-01-25 Thread Stefano Salsano
Il 2016-01-26 01:13, Shivram Krishnan ha scritto: Hey Guys, Hope you all are doing well. I have a simple three switches set up. Lets call them A,B and C . A is connected to B and C , B is connected to A and C and C is connected to A and B. A,B,C are running quagga as a routing daemon and are a

Re: [ovs-discuss] dpdk watchdog stuck?

2016-01-25 Thread Ben Pfaff
Daniele, I think that you said in our meeting today that there was some sort of bug that falsely blames a thread. Can you explain further? On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:29:52PM +0100, Patrik Andersson R wrote: > Right, that is likely for sure. Will look there first. > > What do you think of the cas

[ovs-discuss] double vlan support (QinQ)

2016-01-25 Thread 陆佳美
Hi, I'd like to know is there any patch that supports for 802.1qad (QinQ). Or is there any limitation to support QinQ in ovs2.4.0? Best Regards tutumei ___ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[ovs-discuss] Quagga and OpenvSwitch

2016-01-25 Thread Shivram Krishnan
Hey Guys, Hope you all are doing well. I have a simple three switches set up. Lets call them A,B and C . A is connected to B and C , B is connected to A and C and C is connected to A and B. A,B,C are running quagga as a routing daemon and are able to exchange the routing information. Now I inst

Re: [ovs-discuss] dpdk watchdog stuck?

2016-01-25 Thread Patrik Andersson R
Right, that is likely for sure. Will look there first. What do you think of the case where the thread is "main". I've got examples of this one as well. Have not been able to figure out so far what would cause this. ... ovs-vswitchd.log.1.1.1.1:2016-01-23T01:47:19.026Z|00016|ovs_rcu(urcu2)|WAR

Re: [ovs-discuss] Group table with different split weight

2016-01-25 Thread Jiaqi Zheng
Also I know the split weight is an integer. I have three out ports. If I set split weight to 1, 1 and 1 or I set split weight to 2, 2 and 2, what is the difference ? It is the same, right ? The group will normalize them automatically ? On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon,

[ovs-discuss] dpdk watchdog stuck? (was: ovsrcu_synchronize() blocking while indefinitely waiting for thread to quiesce)

2016-01-25 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 03:09:09PM +0100, Patrik Andersson R wrote: > during robustness testing, where VM:s are booted and deleted using nova > boot/delete in rather rapid succession, VMs get stuck in spawning state > after > a few test cycles. Presumably this is due to the OVS not responding to po

Re: [ovs-discuss] Group table with different split weight

2016-01-25 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:05:03PM -0500, Jiaqi Zheng wrote: > I only have three flow and the group table with three outport is configured > with the same split weight : > Flow 1: source mac: 10.0.0.1 destination mac: 10.0.0.2 > Flow 2: source mac: 10.0.0.1 destination mac: 10.0.0.3 > Flow 3: so

Re: [ovs-discuss] Group table with different split weight

2016-01-25 Thread Jiaqi Zheng
I only have three flow and the group table with three outport is configured with the same split weight : Flow 1: source mac: 10.0.0.1 destination mac: 10.0.0.2 Flow 2: source mac: 10.0.0.1 destination mac: 10.0.0.3 Flow 3: source mac: 10.0.0.1 destination mac: 10.0.0.4 You mean the packets will

Re: [ovs-discuss] Group table with different split weight

2016-01-25 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 06:25:35PM -0800, Jiaqi Zheng wrote: > In my experiments, it seems like something wrong. > > In my experiments, H1 is the source, another three hosts H2, H3 and H4 are > destination. The source host H1 send packets to other three hosts at the > same time. I set group table

Re: [ovs-discuss] How to split in group table with select type

2016-01-25 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:24:38AM -0500, Jiaqi Zheng wrote: > My ovs version is 2.3.0. > > I know if the group table is configured with different split weight. The > flow is splitted through different outport according to configured split > weight. > > In my experiments, it seems like the split

Re: [ovs-discuss] vxlan over IPv6

2016-01-25 Thread Jesse Gross
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 3:59 AM, zhangqunjian wrote: > > Hi, I use OVS created vxlan tunnel based on IPv6. As far as I know, GitHub > master branch has been commited part code of this function. when I used it > into my project，I found that vxlan over IPv6 configuration is working > properly，but f

[ovs-discuss] How to split in group table with select type

2016-01-25 Thread Jiaqi Zheng
Hi All, My ovs version is 2.3.0. I know if the group table is configured with different split weight. The flow is splitted through different outport according to configured split weight. In my experiments, it seems like the split is flow-based, rather than packet-based. right ? Also could I kno

[ovs-discuss] ovsrcu_synchronize() blocking while indefinitely waiting for thread to quiesce

2016-01-25 Thread Patrik Andersson R
Hi, during robustness testing, where VM:s are booted and deleted using nova boot/delete in rather rapid succession, VMs get stuck in spawning state after a few test cycles. Presumably this is due to the OVS not responding to port additions and deletions anymore, or rather that responses to thes