Hi Justin,
We are proposing a solution to the problem in our whitepaper when flows of
same importance are encountered in the case when flow eviction is enabled
on basis of Importance field.
Regards
Shashwat Srivastava
From: Justin Pettit
To: Shashwat Srivastava
Cc: discuss
Date
Thank you for your answers very much.
#
Actually I have add events I care about between poll_timer_wait and
poll_block.
What I want is:
if the event I care about happens, then wake up immediately;
if the event I care about does not happens, then wake up after 1000ms;
I test my codes,
You're free to refer to OVS, but I don't think you need our permission for
that. Is there something other than referring to it that you're doing?
--Justin
> On Jan 21, 2015, at 11:09 PM, Shashwat Srivastava
> wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I am writing a whitepaper and wanted your permission to u
Hi Team,
I am writing a whitepaper and wanted your permission to use the reference
of Open VSwitch in our whitepaper.
Is this the right place to seek permission or please direct me where to
send the mail for the same ?
Regards
Shashwat Srivastava
=-=-=
Notice: The informati
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 01:37:50PM +0800, yewgang wrote:
> These codes is only an example, I decide to write codes in my project by
> hand like below:
>
> for (i = 0; i < LOOP_COUNT_DEFINE_BY_MYSELF; i++) {
> status = ovsdb_idl_txn_commit(txn)
> if (status != TXN_INCOMPLETE)
> bre
These codes is only an example, I decide to write codes in my project by
hand like below:
for (i = 0; i < LOOP_COUNT_DEFINE_BY_MYSELF; i++) {
status = ovsdb_idl_txn_commit(txn)
if (status != TXN_INCOMPLETE)
break;
poll_timer_wait(1000);
poll_block();
}
I hope th
It's not what I recommended. If you're not going to take my advice
anyway then I don't see much point in giving more of it.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:01:54AM +0800, yewgang wrote:
> Thank you. I don't know if these codes will give me faster response ? Could
> I change codes like this ?
>
> enum
Dear Developers,
Thank you. I don't know if these codes will give me faster response ? Could
I change codes like this ?
enum ovsdb_idl_txn_status
ovsdb_idl_txn_commit_block(struct ovsdb_idl_txn *txn)
{
enum ovsdb_idl_txn_status status;
fatal_signal_run();
while ((status = ovsdb_idl_t
Ok, excellent. Thanks for the clarification.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> The updated definition of OFPERR_OFPBRC_IS_SLAVE will use the type and
> code for OFPBRC_EPERM in OpenFlow 1.0 and 1.1, and the type and code
> for OFPBRC_IS_SLAVE in OpenFlow 1.2+ without any specia
The updated definition of OFPERR_OFPBRC_IS_SLAVE will use the type and
code for OFPBRC_EPERM in OpenFlow 1.0 and 1.1, and the type and code
for OFPBRC_IS_SLAVE in OpenFlow 1.2+ without any special logic
elsewhere in the code. In other words, it does the same thing as what
you suggested elsewhere,
Hi All,
The INSTALL.DPDK Mentions
- Work with 1500 MTU, needs few changes in DPDK lib to fix this issue.
I want to push 15K jumbo frames.
What exactly needs to change in DPDK for this? Other than the jumbo frames
flag in the rxmode of the port conf?
Regards,
Dave.
___
This is what I had in mind:
static enum ofperr
reject_slave_controller(struct ofconn *ofconn)
{
if (ofconn_get_type(ofconn) == OFCONN_PRIMARY
&& ofconn_get_role(ofconn) == OFPCR12_ROLE_SLAVE) {
if (ofputil_protocol_to_ofp_version(ofconn_get_protocol(ofconn)) >=
OFP12_VERSION) {
I am actually confused by the fix. OFPBRC_IS_SLAVE is an OpenFlow 1.2+
error message, correct? The comment in the header file is changed and it
appears that this is an OpenFlow 1.0+ error message and I am not sure if
that's right. Likewise OFPBRC_IS_SLAVE is returned while rejecting slave
controlle
I sent out a fix:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-January/050612.html
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 03:01:27PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> The OF1.2 feature was based on an Open vSwitch extension to OpenFlow
> first implemented for OF1.0. We need to continue supporting that
> extension.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:50:10PM +0800, K 華 wrote:
> I tried to change sampling rate in sflow table by sending JSON to OVSDB.
> I found that sampling rate would be configured after sending JSON to OVSDB,
> but it did not work immediately and did work after no packet passing.
>
> How to make sam
Hello all,
>From an OpenFlow view, how should a controller reply to a message-in
containing an ARP request (that the of-switch didn't know how to handle) ?
in both cases:
1. the controller has the info about the requested IP
2. the controller has not the info
Thank you
Abdelhadi
Hello,
I observed that the latest OVS with dpdk-1.8.0 and igb_uio starts to
drop packets earlier than a regular Linux ixgbe 10G interface, setup
follows:
receiver/forwarder:
- 8 core/2 head system with E5-2603v2, cores 1-3 are given to OVS exclusively
- n-dpdk-rxqs=6, rx scattering is not enabled
hi,
I tried to change sampling rate in sflow table by sending JSON to OVSDB.
I found that sampling rate would be configured after sending JSON to OVSDB,
but it did not work immediately and did work after no packet passing.
How to make sampling rate work after sending JSON to OVSDB with no delay?O
18 matches
Mail list logo
