Linux, signaled to do so by OVS.
On Sunday, December 21, 2014, Tal Yaniv wrote:
> Thanks Jesse,
>
> But it is still not clear to me, which module actually adds the tunnel
> header to the packet? Is it the OVS or the Linux?
>
> Best Regards,
> Tal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jesse Gros
Thanks Jesse,
But it is still not clear to me, which module actually adds the tunnel header
to the packet? Is it the OVS or the Linux?
Best Regards,
Tal
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Gross [mailto:je...@nicira.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 17:48
To: Tal Yaniv
Cc: discuss@openv
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Tal Yaniv wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’d like Linux network stack to handle my routing, if I define an OVS
> bridge, with several interfaces (eth0-eth2) , which are on different
> networks.
>
> Plus, several VXLAN ports on the same bridge.
>
> And I define a flow with a
Hi,
I'd like Linux network stack to handle my routing, if I define an OVS bridge,
with several interfaces (eth0-eth2) , which are on different networks.
Plus, several VXLAN ports on the same bridge.
And I define a flow with a VXLAN encapsulation action and output to LOCAL
(meaning to the Linux n