> > If not I was thinking of coding up a patch that would replace the
> > current dl_dst hash with a function that chose the tuple based on type
> > of traffic. If the flow is a TCP or UDP one the new function would hash
> > based on the 5-tuple. Other traffic would just use the dl_dst based
> > ha
hi:
I have a question. I want to know that how can I wirte a third-party in
openvswitch for control VM‘s traffic redirect to a specified
VM(eg.firewall,IPS)，I don't want to use flowtable to realize that,I want to use
third-party or linux module to do it. I have done that code a module based
hi:
I have a question. I want to know that how can I wirte a thied-party in
openvswitch for control VM‘s traffic Redirect to a specified
VM(eg.firewall,IPS)，I don't want to use flowtable to realize that,I want to use
third-party or linux module to do it. I have done that code a module
basedn
Hello Everybody,
after upgrading from 2.1.2 to 2.3.0 i cannot start VM's calling the
"vif-openvswitch" script anymore and libxl throws the following error:
libxl: error: libxl_exec.c:129:libxl_report_child_exitstatus:
/etc/xen/scripts/vif-openvswitch online [-1] died due to fatal signal Killed
The Open vSwitch team is pleased to announce the release of Open vSwitch 2.3.0:
http://openvswitch.org/releases/openvswitch-2.3.0.tar.gz
This release contains new features and further performance improvements.
Feature highlights of 2.3.0 include:
* Linux kernel datapath performance for
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 03:14:05PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> Speaking on how ports works and limits, I've heard about an interesting
> problem when using containers. If you add more than 1k containers to
> an OVS bridge, the network starts to fail. The reason is that when
> flooding packets
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:36:49AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 02:29:49PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:01:56AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > > > If it's kernel DP, then patch ports are i
Thanks! I will try out and see which is the best solution for me. will
update here if it works for me :)
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> You're doing something that no one really wants to do (as far as I
> know). I see this as not a real problem, therefore it doesn't need a
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 09:58:09PM +0530, Monica Gawas wrote:
> Ben Flaff : "What do you see as the most important deficiency?"
>
> Being quite the beginners in this stuff, we found some very basic
> deficiencies like :
> 1. QoS implementations in ovs only support a simple rate limiting ,
> r
You're doing something that no one really wants to do (as far as I
know). I see this as not a real problem, therefore it doesn't need a
real solution.
You can use veths, I think.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 01:42:20PM -0400, Krishna Pratap wrote:
> Yea I saw that but my question is ...should I be ch
Yea I saw that but my question is ...should I be changing that? I am sort
of new to ovs. is there any other way to connect switches?
Since the same packet is being forwarded by all switches it reaches that
recursion limit. so apart from increasing this limit ..do we have another
solution?
Thanks
You can increase MAX_RESUBMIT_RECURSION in ofproto-dpif-xlate.c.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 01:22:55PM -0400, Krishna Pratap wrote:
> yes Ben, you maybe right. I saw it in log file when i enabled debugging .
>
> *2014-08-12T10:55:26.658Z|00070|ofproto_dpif_xlate(handler_1)|ERR|resubmit
> actions rec
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 02:29:49PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:01:56AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > > If it's kernel DP, then patch ports are internal ports which during TX
> > > inserts the packet (skb) into t
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:01:56AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > If it's kernel DP, then patch ports are internal ports which during TX
> > inserts the packet (skb) into the CPU backlog queue (enqueue_to_backlog())
> > for later processing. L
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:01:56AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > If it's kernel DP, then patch ports are internal ports which during TX
> > inserts the packet (skb) into the CPU backlog queue (enqueue_to_backlog())
> > for later processing. L
yes Ben, you maybe right. I saw it in log file when i enabled debugging .
*2014-08-12T10:55:26.658Z|00070|ofproto_dpif_xlate(handler_1)|ERR|resubmit
actions recursed over 64 times*
Is there a way to work around this? how can i remove this limit to see if
it crashes or not. are there any other way
OK. You know better than us what you need, so please consider
submitting a patch.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 06:37:40PM -0300, Emerson Chiesse wrote:
> I suggest some kind of customization at ofproto provider, allowing to
> choose appropriate table to install each of the in-band flows, maybe at
> ru
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> If it's kernel DP, then patch ports are internal ports which during TX
> inserts the packet (skb) into the CPU backlog queue (enqueue_to_backlog())
> for later processing. Later on, the backlog queue is processed
> (process_backlog()) and t
Dear Sirs,
Thank You for your replies.
Wes Felter : "Is there documentation about how to perform per-tenant QoS on a
physical
port in an overlay network like Neutron ML2? Since the
tenants are on
the integration bridge and the
Hi there --
I came across an issue today what I was attempting to modify the source
ipv6 address of a router advertisement generated from a local server. The
flow in question looks like:
ovs-ofctl add-flow public
'priority=2040,icmp6,in_port=LOCAL,ipv6_dst=ff02::1,table=1,idle_timeout=0,actions=
Hi,
The kernel version is 3.8.0-38 ( Linux ccpu1 3.8.0-38-generic
#56~precise1-Ubuntu)
I think you are right. it is the kernel datapath which is used by the
patch ports. I am not too familiar with working you explained about
the backlog queue.
i will have to explore the suggestions that you have m
hi.
i have a server which is truncked and using these commands to set ip
address and vlans, so it works ok :
# ovs-vsctl add-br br0
# ovs-vsctl add-port br0 eth0
# ovs-vsctl add-br br_host br0 216
# ifconfig eth0 0
# ifconfig br0 0
# ifconfig br_host 172.20.26.28 up
# route add default gw 172.20.
>
> That was true for several releases, but 2.1 now changes port numbers when
> when ofport_request column is updated.
I see. Thanks.
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 07:24:28AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Rod N. Melton wrote:
> > Is there an ovs-ofctl or ovs-vsctl command I can use to force/change the
> > switch port numbers to not change for a given interface (say s1-eth2) when i
> > reboot linux/
Hi there --
I came across an issue today what I was attempting to modify the source
ipv6 address of a router advertisement generated from a local server. The
flow in question looks like:
ovs-ofctl add-flow public
'priority=2040,icmp6,in_port=LOCAL,ipv6_dst=ff02::1,table=1,idle_timeout=0,actions=
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Rod N. Melton wrote:
> I posted this question on mininet-discuss mail list and they insist that it
> is an open vswitch question.
>
> why do the port numbers assigned to an interface (say s1-eth2) change when
> linux system is rebooted?
So, you are rebooting the ma
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
> Can you run "ovs-dpctl dump-flows" while these messages are being logged? Do
> you see anything flow-related in dmesg? I can see these errors are
> preventing flows from being inserted into the kernel, but I'd still expect
> the traff
Sorry, but does RSTP already in 2.1.x ovs or in stable branch?
2014-08-14 3:06 GMT+04:00 Andrew Niteesh :
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Regards,
> Andrew Niteesh
> University of Houston
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> On August 13, 2014 at 11:16:08 AM, Andrew Niteesh (andrewec.
On August 13, 2014 at 10:57:05 PM, Srini Seetharaman
(srini.seethara...@gmail.com) wrote:
> *$ tail -2 /var/log/openvswitch/ovs-vswitchd.log*
> 2014-08-14T05:52:52.803Z|00583|dpif(handler81)|WARN|system@ovs-system:
> failed to put[create] (Invalid argument)
> skb_priority(0),in_port(2),skb_mark(0
29 matches
Mail list logo
