[ovs-discuss] Is it allowed to delete a meter that is used by active flows?

2014-07-29 Thread Gur Stavi
Hello, The 'meter_del' callback of ofproto_class does not have a return value. What should happen when there is an attempt to delete a meter that is used by active flows? Thanks, Gur [E-Banner] The contents of this message, together with any attachments

Re: [ovs-discuss] OFP v1.3 match normalisation & set field syntax

2014-07-29 Thread Wenqin SHAO
Hi Ben, Thank you very much for explaining all that. It's crystal clear for me now. Regards, Wenqin On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:02:22PM +0200, Wenqin SHAO wrote: > > Second issues comes with the use of set_filed option while formulating > > a

Re: [ovs-discuss] OFP v1.3 match normalisation & set field syntax

2014-07-29 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:02:22PM +0200, Wenqin SHAO wrote: > Second issues comes with the use of set_filed option while formulating > actions: > > sudo ovs-ofctl -O OpenFlow13 add-flow s1 > actions=set_field:01:02:03:04:05:06->dl_dst,output:1 > ovs-ofctl: 01:02:03:04:05:06-: missing `->' > > I

Re: [ovs-discuss] OFP v1.3 match normalisation & set field syntax

2014-07-29 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:02:22PM +0200, Wenqin SHAO wrote: > Hi list, > > New to here, and I encountered some seem-to-be-very-basic problems > concerning flow installation. Here it goes: > > First, it's about matching normalisation, I tried to install a rule > manually via ovs-ofctl. > > sudo

Re: [ovs-discuss] bug: Adding or deleting port results to flush of QoS policy for all bridge ports

2014-07-29 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 10:25:27PM +0400, Andrey Korolyov wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 07:29:24PM +0400, Andrey Korolyov wrote: > >> Assuming we have trivial case: libvirt, its QoS limits (for which > >> appropriate rules are executed for e

Re: [ovs-discuss] packet ins and packet outs in relation to LLDP

2014-07-29 Thread Ben Pfaff
I'm not sure why you're trying to add specific LLDP support to OVS. An OpenFlow controller can implement LLDP without special support from a switch. On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:53:05PM +, Eyal Nissim wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > 1. I need to identify and process remote controller 's

[ovs-discuss] Detecting Elephant flow on OVS

2014-07-29 Thread Bhargav Bhikkaji
How do one detect Elephant flow on OVS ?. Is there a configurable value, if so, can you provide more details ? -Bhargav ___ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[ovs-discuss] packet ins and packet outs in relation to LLDP

2014-07-29 Thread Eyal Nissim
Hi everyone, 1. I need to identify and process remote controller 's LLDP requests Having looked at OVS-DISCUSS previous correspondence, I've found out that as of now OVS doesn't support LLDP nor do I see any traces for LLDP in the code. (please confirm) 2. I under

Re: [ovs-discuss] Unable to make Netflow v5 working

2014-07-29 Thread Duy Bach Ha
Hello, Just to sum up and ask for help since I'm doing a thesis and have stuck here for a long time. You guys don't have to follow the other 2 emails because I sum all here. Sincerely thanks for your support. Experimental mininet 2.1.0 network of 6 ovs switches 2.1.2 and some hosts (with ip

[ovs-discuss] unable to set no-cache for flow table

2014-07-29 Thread loy wolfe
sometimes we have to set a filter rule with 5-tuple for some certain mac address. but after we set it, it seems that many upcall event appears, and kernel datapath is un-wildcard, from L2 flow to L4 flow. we setup another table to match it: when L2 information is matched in the master table, then

Re: [ovs-discuss] Gre tunnel segmenting packets to 1500 bytes

2014-07-29 Thread Kristoffer Egefelt
I actually asked them: http://lists.opencontrail.org/pipermail/users_lists.opencontrail.org/2014-July/000338.html As I understood it, they are able to offload from VM to VM, without segmentation - maybe I’m wroing, and what actually is happening is that their vrouter module, on the receiving sid