On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> That's cool!
> Just one more question.
> >Due to the race condition in userspace, there is chance that two
> >overlapping megaflows could be installed in datapath. And this
> >causes userspace unable to delete the less in
Hi Alex,
That's cool!
Just one more question.
>Due to the race condition in userspace, there is chance that two
>overlapping megaflows could be installed in datapath. And this
>causes userspace unable to delete the less inclusive megaflow flow
>even after it timeout, since the flo
Thanks for the additional information.
I'm still having a hard time seeing how a flow could be invalid
without generating any log messages so I just sent out a patch to
hopefully cover the remaining cases (CC'ed to you). The patch is
against master - is it possible for you to try it and report any
Hi,
I would like to prioritize in-band controller and manager (OVSDB) traffic
(on linux.) The goal is to guarantee that these traffic goes out first,
without rate-limiting other traffic.
I noticed that controller traffic goes out with dscp=48. However, since
Linux do not understand dscp, the tra
Hi !
Thanks for the patch. From Flavio's email which said:
"Usually the rpmbuild topdir is /usr/src/ but it can be changed
by a custom .rpmmacro file defining %_topdir.
Yours seems to be at /root/rpmbuild. That's your rpm build directory. On
top of it, you should have SPECS/ and SOURCES/. So, c
Hi,
Did you manage to resolve the issue? I am facing a similar problem. Thanks
Ahmad
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:40:31AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:28:54PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:22:10AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:13:20PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:05:15A
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:28:54PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:22:10AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:13:20PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:05:15AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:57:17P
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:22:10AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:13:20PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:05:15AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:57:17PM -0400, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> > >
> > > > if I have a rule, nw_src=192
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 03:13:20PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:05:15AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:57:17PM -0400, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> >
> > > if I have a rule, nw_src=192.168.0.0/16 and a specific rule,
> > > nw_src=192.168.0.1/32 and a pa
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 11:05:15AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:57:17PM -0400, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>
> > if I have a rule, nw_src=192.168.0.0/16 and a specific rule,
> > nw_src=192.168.0.1/32 and a packet comes from 192.168.0.1, which
> > rule will it match? the /16 or /32?
that makes sense. thanks Ben!
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:57:17PM -0400, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> if I have a rule, nw_src=192.168.0.0/16 and a specific rule,
> nw_src=192.168.0.1/32 and a packet comes from 192.168.0.1, which
> rule will it match? the /16 or /32? I want to match the 192.168.0.1
> packet even if I have both rules
Hi
if I have a rule, nw_src=192.168.0.0/16 and a specific rule,
nw_src=192.168.0.1/32 and a packet comes from 192.168.0.1, which rule will it
match? the /16 or /32? I want to match the 192.168.0.1 packet even if I have
both rules
_
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 01:14:16PM +0100, Joni Lee wrote:
> We seem to face a concurrent issue between 2 processes: "add-br" and "find
> Interface" as follows
>
> 1. A "l3 agent" process added a port q-router to a bridge (br-int) by calling
> "ovs-vsctl?add-port"?and the command returned success
We are moving off vmware due to licensing costs and we don’t use vsphere at all
for what we pay for it. So we are looking to go to KVM and using openvswitch
like vmare vswitch. I’m wondering if there is anything special that needs to be
done other then set a vlan tag on a fake bridge interface.
Hi,
We seem to face a concurrent issue between 2 processes: "add-br" and "find
Interface" as follows
1. A "l3 agent" process added a port q-router to a bridge (br-int) by calling
"ovs-vsctl add-port" and the command returned successfully:
Jun 30 07:30:13 neutron1 ovs-vsctl: 1|vsctl|INFO|Ca
17 matches
Mail list logo
