On April 30, 2014 at 11:01:10 AM, Ben Pfaff (b...@nicira.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 06:37:27PM +0200, Christian Stigen Larsen wrote:
> > This is it!
> >
> > I've verified it with/and without the commit, plus a reboot, just to be
> > sure.
> >
> > Thank you so much for all the help!
>
>
The Open vSwitch team is pleased to announce the release of Open vSwitch 2.1.2:
http://openvswitch.org/releases/openvswitch-2.1.2.tar.gz
This contains bug fixes related to sending packet-in messages to the controller.
--The Open vSwitch Team
Open vSwitch is a pro
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:04 AM, VAN BEMMEL, Jeroen (Jeroen)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> A recently discovered bug in OpenSSL – a.k.a. the “Heartbleed” bug – has
> raised security concerns in many IT organizations. Even though the issue
> itself was easily patched, there are many vulnerable servers out th
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:35:58PM +0200, Pasquale Dir wrote:
> as long as no controller is associated to my openvswitch vlan tags assure
> me vlan isolation.
>
> After setting the controller (floodlight in my case, but I also tried
> opendaylight) vlan tags are just ignored.
The FAQ says:
Q: My
Hello,
as long as no controller is associated to my openvswitch vlan tags assure
me vlan isolation.
After setting the controller (floodlight in my case, but I also tried
opendaylight) vlan tags are just ignored.
Is this intended?
Regards,
Pasquale
___
Hi,
A recently discovered bug in OpenSSL - a.k.a. the "Heartbleed" bug - has raised
security concerns in many IT organizations. Even though the issue itself was
easily patched, there are many vulnerable servers out there, and some of these
may never get patched. It is expected that Heartbleed w
Hello,
I am using Open vSwitch with OpenStack. I have a requirement, where I have to
insert tags in packets to capture states. There are many fields that could be
used for tagging purposes in the IP header.
I would like to know which fields, if used for tagging, OpenFlow rules can
recognize a
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 09:26:55PM -0400, Mark Haywood wrote:
> On 4/29/14 3:58 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 03:51:45PM -0400, Mark Haywood wrote:
> >>On 4/28/14 11:53 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 07:01:02PM -0400, Mark Haywood wrote:
> On 4/28/14, 6:36 P
Christian Stigen Larsen :
>> An RTT of 87 ms is very high to begin with. What does mininet do that
>> could cause such a high RTT?
>
> Fair point. Honestly, I don't know, but perhaps I can ask on mininet-discuss.
>
> I thought it was simply due to the Python controller. Remember it gets all
>
