Hi
I'm running OVS on top of Ubuntu 13.10. I have installed OVS and built the
tip of the latest master (as of yesterday).
I'm trying to setup VXLAN between two machines.
The two machines can ping each other on their DHCP assigned addresses.
On M1 I setup:
$ sudo ovs-vsctl add-br br1
$ sudo if
I'm running OpenVSwitch 1.11 from the RDO Havana repository. In
addition, I'm running OpenStack Havana, Neutron, and Ceph Emperor, all
on some CentOS 6.5 machines.
After installing Bacula on the previous openstack version (grizzly), I
noticed the networking had become somewhat load sensitive.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Vasu Dasari wrote:
> Thanks Ben. It works. Just a small typo in your patch.
>
> +port->pp.state = ((port->pp.state & ~OFPUTIL_PS_LINK_DOWN)
>
> + | (pp->state & OFPUTIL_PS_LINK_DOWN));
>
>
> Can you please tell me how is the ofproto_modifi
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:11 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:43:00PM +0800, Kmindg G wrote:
>> I find that We do not update OFPUTIL_PC_PORT_DOWN bit of port's config
>> immediately in update_port_config.
>> Is there any reason to delay this update?
>
> I think it's really that th
Thanks Ben. It works. Just a small typo in your patch.
+port->pp.state = ((port->pp.state & ~OFPUTIL_PS_LINK_DOWN)
+ | (pp->state & OFPUTIL_PS_LINK_DOWN));
Can you please tell me how is the ofproto_modified() function is
called(what is the event which triggers this).
Tha
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 06:58:58PM -0500, Vasu Dasari wrote:
> On debugging this issue further, I found that, ofproto's STP state bits are
> getting updated correctly because of following call stack:
>
> #0 ofproto_port_set_state (port=0x82395c0, state=OFPUTIL_PS_STP_FORWARD)
> at ../ofproto/
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 05:43:00PM +0800, Kmindg G wrote:
> I find that We do not update OFPUTIL_PC_PORT_DOWN bit of port's config
> immediately in update_port_config.
> Is there any reason to delay this update?
I think it's really that there's a separate code path that notices
changes in port fla
Yes, setting the sampling-rate to 1-in-1 will give you every packet
header, along with the attendant meta-data. Useful for testing, even if
you would never use it in production.
Neil
--
Neil McKee
InMon Corp.
http://www.inmon.com
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Weiyu Liu wrote:
> Hey,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I don't know of anyone working on these features.
>
> I would pick one small project to start and then later take on more if
> you have time. Bundles are a huge project, table synchronization is
> pretty pointless for a software switch, and so
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 05:32:19PM +0530, Shivanker Goel wrote:
> I am a CS Major, Undergraduate student at IIT Delhi. I was looking for a
> roughly 6-7 week project on the lines of extending OVS with OF 1.3+ specs.
> So I had a look at the OPENFLOW-1.1+ document in OVS and think that I could
> wor
Hi guys,
I am a CS Major, Undergraduate student at IIT Delhi. I was looking for a
roughly 6-7 week project on the lines of extending OVS with OF 1.3+ specs.
So I had a look at the OPENFLOW-1.1+ document in OVS and think that I could
work on some topics in ONF 1.3.X Extensions required for OF1.4. I
11 matches
Mail list logo
