Re: [ovs-discuss] [ovs-dev] Error after inserting MPLS flow using OVS2.0

2014-02-07 Thread Ben Pfaff
Cut it out with the CC to discuss-request, by the way. It makes no sense at all and just causes a bounce back. ___ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Re: [ovs-discuss] Adding a flow without specifying output port in OVS

2014-02-07 Thread Ben Pfaff
I don't understand the question. It is too vague. On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 11:02:38AM +0530, Ramana Reddy wrote: > Thanks Ben. > What happen in this scenario: > I have added a rule to modify the header with out considering the in_port ( > taking all the incoming packets to the ovs) > and sending t

Re: [ovs-discuss] Adding a flow without specifying output port in OVS

2014-02-07 Thread Ramana Reddy
Thanks Ben. What happen in this scenario: I have added a rule to modify the header with out considering the in_port ( taking all the incoming packets to the ovs) and sending to the destination via OVS. While getting back from the destination to source via OVS, the header is again modified and sendi

Re: [ovs-discuss] Adding a flow without specifying output port in OVS

2014-02-07 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:14:46PM +0530, Ramana Reddy wrote: > What happens if the ovs-ofctl add-flow does not specify output:$portno in > actions field. > Want to send an outgoing flow after modifying the header with out > explicitly specifying the > outgoing portno in actions field. Does ovs use

Re: [ovs-discuss] Adding a flow without specifying output port in OVS

2014-02-07 Thread Ramana Reddy
Hi, What happens if the ovs-ofctl add-flow does not specify output:$portno in actions field. Want to send an outgoing flow after modifying the header with out explicitly specifying the outgoing portno in actions field. Does ovs uses L2 learning table in this case. Thanks, Ramana. On Fri, Feb 7,

[ovs-discuss] Adding a flow without specifying output port in OVS

2014-02-07 Thread Ramana Reddy
Hi, What happens if the ovs-ofctl add-flow does not specify output:$portno in actions field. Want to send an outgoing flow after modifying the header with out explicitly specifying the outgoing portno in actions field. Does ovs uses L2 learning table in this case. Thanks, Ramana.

[ovs-discuss] Fw: [ovs-dev] Error after inserting MPLS flow using OVS2.0

2014-02-07 Thread Madhusudhan Kandadai
Resending it again as it is bounced back   Thanks, Madhusudhan On Thursday, February 6, 2014 7:17 PM, Madhusudhan Kandadai wrote: Hello, I am sure this is going to be the repeated question. But this time, I tried to debug what exactly going on with my problem. I have inserted a flow and i

Re: [ovs-discuss] Setting MPLS label while adding a flow

2014-02-07 Thread Madhusudhan Kandadai
I came to know that, the packets are not flowing from in_port to output after I push a flow with MPLS label. I tried using OVS2.0. The exact problem is, the packets are not coming at the output from in_port. Am I doing wrong with this? I would appreciate if you can shed some light on this regar

Re: [ovs-discuss] Setting MPLS label while adding a flow

2014-02-07 Thread Vasu Dasari
Madhusudan, You can get some pointers from http://horms.org/pleb_blossom/permalink/2013/2013-10-16T10_00_55.shtml for MPLS related code. -Vasu On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Madhusudhan Kandadai < madhusudhan.opendayli...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I came to know that, the packets are not flowing fr

Re: [ovs-discuss] Tunneling decided against output - multiple flow based tunnels

2014-02-07 Thread Kristoffer Egefelt
I see, thanks, got it working using patches and a single tunnel bridge, which are then connected to all customer bridges, like this: ovs-vsctl del-br br1 ovs-vsctl add-br br1 -- set bridge br1 other_config:hwaddr=f6:8d:91:7b:99:01 other_config:disable-in-band=true ovs-vsctl add-port br1 gre1 --