can someone help ?
2013/8/22 不坏阿峰 :
> vm with openvswitch+KVM can not access extranal network, can ping gateway
>
> Cloudstack4.1.1
> A: one kvm host ubuntu12.04 with openvswitch,
> B: xen server6.0,
> C: one kvm host centos with openvswitch
>
> in cloudstack have two network.
> Guestvlan301 Isol
How are you sending the packets and what exactly do you see with
tcpdump? 1480 is a suspicious length since it is the maximum payload
of an IP packet, not a GRE packet. It sounds like the host is simply
fragmenting the packet before it gets to OVS.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Theodore Elhoura
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:29 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 2- local_bh_disable()
>
> This is how it is implemented:
>
> +void local_bh_disable(void)
> +{
> + migrate_disable();
> + current->softirq_nestcnt++;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(local_bh_disable);
>
> And here is the problem: Code curren
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Rakesh B.K wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I disable the checksum offload of ethx (both in guest and host)I am not
> able to reproduce the problem(received correct checksum 0x).
> When using normal linux bridge instead of OVS, the issue is not reproducible
> (I am get
This is version 1.10.
Setting the MTUs to take into account the additional GRE headers, was
actually the only way to get packets of 1480 wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Theodore Elhourani
> wrote:
> > If the original packets are of length <= 1400, then they are successfully
> > trans
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Theodore Elhourani
wrote:
> If the original packets are of length <= 1400, then they are successfully
> transmitted through the tunnel. Only when a packet is greater than ~1480 it
> gets dropped. You are right the ip stack is fragmenting the large packets,
> but be
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:42:22PM +0530, Rahul arora wrote:
> I want to implement some protocols like* OSPF,rstp *in the OpenvSwitch .But
> i don't know how to.Please help me regarding this.
STP is already supported. I would implement RSTP by replacing
lib/stp.[ch] by an RSTP implementation.
I
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:44:49PM +1200, Tony van der Peet wrote:
> I want to propose that we should wrap free() just like the other memory
> allocation routines are. In other words, create an xfree() in util.c and
> call that instead of free().
No.
> Reasons for doing this are:
>
> - consisten
On Aug 23, 2013, at 6:55 AM, P Balaji-B37839 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using Neturon-OVS Plugin for creating VXLAN network.
>
> When we use OVS - 1.10.1 , We didn't face any of the below issues and we
> could able to get IPAddress for VM interfaces on Compute Nodes.
>
> Regards,
> Balaji.P
I a
Hi,
We are using Neturon-OVS Plugin for creating VXLAN network.
When we use OVS - 1.10.1 , We didn't face any of the below issues and we could
able to get IPAddress for VM interfaces on Compute Nodes.
Regards,
Balaji.P
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Mestery (kmestery) [mailto:kmest...@c
10 matches
Mail list logo
