Hello all,
I am trying to use the ovs-ofctl replace-flows command to add flows from a file
that includes multiple tables. However, I am running into some issues.
First, when it works all the flows are added into table 0 and the table that is
specified in the flow is ignored:
[root@g1dlgenlab0
Hi All,
Currently I want to incorporate openvswitch support into our own research
project, for example, I want to be able to create openvswitch bridge, add port
to the bridge and all kinds of bridge related activities in the programs on
demand. I want to do this in a programatic way. I am looki
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:20 AM, lei yang wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> I just see you report some memleak with Valgrind, but I don't know how it
> used by you in ovs.
>
> for valgrind, I just know " valgrind --tool=memcheck program_name" can do
> this thing, but I don't know
> how it used by you, mayb
Hi Justin,
I just see you report some memleak with Valgrind, but I don't know how it
used by you in ovs.
for valgrind, I just know " valgrind --tool=memcheck program_name" can do
this thing, but I don't know
how it used by you, maybe has a better or wrapper to do this,
can you show me the way?
Thanks Justin,it worked,but doesn't it create mesh topology,is there any
way we can do it in a better way like star topology or similar.So that i
can easily add 50+ hosts with out creating 49 endpoints.
once again thank for your help.
ananthan
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Justin Pettit wrote
Thank you very much. I got it.
--
At 2013-05-31 07:29:41,"Jesse Gross" wrote:
>On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:31 AM, zuo wrote:
>> Thank you for providing the requested information.
>> I found that "subfacet->slow_path_reason == 0" indicates packets is
>> processed by fast path, so in this case
Thank you,
i will continue this discussion in xen maillists.
--
*/Best regards,/*
/Eugene Istomin/
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Eugene Istomin
wrote:
> >> This is dependent on the hypervisor and not being restricted by OVS.
> >> However, the direct benefits of vlan offloading are very
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Eugene Istomin wrote:
>> This is dependent on the hypervisor and not being restricted by OVS.
>> However, the direct benefits of vlan offloading are very minimal and
>> are really only useful in relation to enabling other offloads.
>
> In my testbed results are not
> This is dependent on the hypervisor and not being restricted by OVS.
> However, the direct benefits of vlan offloading are very minimal and
> are really only useful in relation to enabling other offloads.
In my testbed results are not minimal (untagged by OVS have ~2 times more
bandwith than un
